On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Jeffrey Blackburne
wrote:
> It would be nice to have. Since the patch edge seemed to be using a "round"
> style and I wanted "miter", my workaround was just to use a separate step
> plot to overlay the outline. But for more general cases (e.g., a bar plot not
>
On 09/06/2011 04:48 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> On 08/31/2011 01:20 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> On 08/31/2011 06:45 AM, Jeffrey Blackburne wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Are the edges of the rectangles returned by plt.bar() supposed to conform
>>> to the 'lines.solid_joinstyle' rcParam? If not, is there
On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>On 08/31/2011 01:20 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> On 08/31/2011 06:45 AM, Jeffrey Blackburne wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Are the edges of the rectangles returned by plt.bar() supposed to conform
>>> to the 'lines.solid_joinstyle' rcParam? If not, is th
On 08/31/2011 01:20 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 08/31/2011 06:45 AM, Jeffrey Blackburne wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Are the edges of the rectangles returned by plt.bar() supposed to conform to
>> the 'lines.solid_joinstyle' rcParam? If not, is there another method for
>> specifying that joinstyle?
>>
>>
On 08/31/2011 06:45 AM, Jeffrey Blackburne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are the edges of the rectangles returned by plt.bar() supposed to conform to
> the 'lines.solid_joinstyle' rcParam? If not, is there another method for
> specifying that joinstyle?
>
> I have not been able to change the joinstyle using t
Hi,
Are the edges of the rectangles returned by plt.bar() supposed to conform to
the 'lines.solid_joinstyle' rcParam? If not, is there another method for
specifying that joinstyle?
I have not been able to change the joinstyle using this method in versions
1.0.0 (linux, gtkagg and tkagg) or 1.0
