On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 07:54:18AM -0800, Andrew Straw wrote:
> > Any interest in merging this in as an mpl_toolkit?
> It already is. :)
Me dig hole and hide.
> Any interest in writing docs and advertising it?
Well, first I'll use it :). I can advertise if I and up using it a lot.
Gaël
-
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 07:32:27AM -0800, Andrew Straw wrote:
>
>> This first is mplsizer, based on the wx layout model, and works "live"
>> (with a figure open in a GUI) as well as for saving to disk. See the
>> demo directory for, well, some demos. I haven't been using
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 07:32:27AM -0800, Andrew Straw wrote:
> This first is mplsizer, based on the wx layout model, and works "live"
> (with a figure open in a GUI) as well as for saving to disk. See the
> demo directory for, well, some demos. I haven't been using this too much
> lately, but it s
per freem wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i am a *huge fan* of matplotlib and use it for all plotting. one
> feature that i would find extremely useful that i believe is missing
> (but am very open to being corrected in case i overlooked something)
> is a way to define the layout of complex subplots. by this
hi all,
i am a *huge fan* of matplotlib and use it for all plotting. one
feature that i would find extremely useful that i believe is missing
(but am very open to being corrected in case i overlooked something)
is a way to define the layout of complex subplots. by this i mean
something like R's "l
