On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Daπid wrote:
> I don't know if there is any reason for not having it, but as a
> workaround, you could use np.hist to get the data (syntax is the same
> as mpl.hist and returns the same numbers, but without drawing) and
> then renormalise and plot with mpl.bars.
>
On 2012/07/12 7:20 AM, Damon McDougall wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:42:59AM -0400, Alan G Isaac wrote:
>> This is essentially a query about why certain histogram types
>> are not offered. I can see two possible answers: haven't gotten
>> to them, or, don't want to offer them (e.g., they're
I don't know if there is any reason for not having it, but as a
workaround, you could use np.hist to get the data (syntax is the same
as mpl.hist and returns the same numbers, but without drawing) and
then renormalise and plot with mpl.bars.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:42:59AM -0400, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> This is essentially a query about why certain histogram types
> are not offered. I can see two possible answers: haven't gotten
> to them, or, don't want to offer them (e.g., they're bad practice).
>
> I will choose Stata as a point
This is essentially a query about why certain histogram types
are not offered. I can see two possible answers: haven't gotten
to them, or, don't want to offer them (e.g., they're bad practice).
I will choose Stata as a point of comparison.
http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?hist
The types are density,
