On 10/18/12 5:45 AM, Damon McDougall wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Alexander Eberspaecher
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:38:27 +0100
>> Damon McDougall wrote:
>>
>>> How do people feel about perhaps adding a matplotlib version, mocking
>>> the same calling signature
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 18/10/2012 12:54, Alexander Eberspaecher wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:45:24 +0100
>> Damon McDougall wrote:
>>
>>
>> Using e.g. optparse, multiple data files shouldn't be too complicated.
>>
>
> For the record optparse is deprecated s
On 18/10/2012 12:54, Alexander Eberspaecher wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:45:24 +0100
> Damon McDougall wrote:
>
>
> Using e.g. optparse, multiple data files shouldn't be too complicated.
>
For the record optparse is deprecated so use argparse. This might also
be helpful http://www.youtube.co
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:45:24 +0100
Damon McDougall wrote:
> Ok wow, awesome feedback! I started on this yesterday morning to see
> how it would go, and I've already got something working that mimics
> the command-line syntax of GNU's `graph` (except it currently only
> supports one data file as i
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Alexander Eberspaecher
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:38:27 +0100
> Damon McDougall wrote:
>
>> How do people feel about perhaps adding a matplotlib version, mocking
>> the same calling signature as graph?
>>
>> I think the most important question is:
Hello,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:38:27 +0100
Damon McDougall wrote:
> How do people feel about perhaps adding a matplotlib version, mocking
> the same calling signature as graph?
>
> I think the most important question is: would it be useful?
Yes, this would certainly be useful! I think there are
I totally agree with to general opinion that a command line tool would be
beneficial.
I've written a simple mpl commandline plotter quite some time ago and use it
frequently for
quick previews but also to create simple plots for presentations. It features
some options to
modify the appearance j
I can certainly see the benefit. As Mike said, I don't think I would use it
myself, but I could see non-python users finding it useful.
Personally, I think this would be a nice extension that doesn't have to
live in the core matplotlib code base. That way release cycles and testing
can be done com
I also think that would be useful. It would, for example, allow to
generate "preview" plots from other languages, without interfacing
them to Python. It must be said that MPL is actually quite nice
looking in the default settings for basic plotting, and this is an
nice feature that can exploit.
I
I think this could be very useful -- and might help increase the user
base beyond the Python community. As I, and most of us on this list,
are quite comfortable with Python, I don't think I'd use it myself, but
I certainly see the utility of it.
Mike
On 10/17/2012 06:38 AM, Damon McDougall wr
All,
I was brain-storming yesterday and I wanted to test the waters to see
if people would find it useful.
Currently, GNU plotutils comes with command-line utilities such as
`graph` to create quick and dirty line plots like this:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/manual/html_node/DWT-Examples.html.
11 matches
Mail list logo
