Friedrich,
Our e-mails crossed. I don't think the numbers need to have the same
exponent. I would go with (d) as my example does. The more difficult
part to my mind is the number of significant digits to use. The current
code that determines whether to use an offset or not must look at the
num
2010/10/19 Jonathan Slavin :
> I think that'd be fine -- i.e. the option of \cdot or \times (though in
> the gmane preview the dot looks a bit low). In the mean time, I came up
> with the method below that worked for my purpose.
Okay thx
> import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
> import numpy as np
> f
I think that'd be fine -- i.e. the option of \cdot or \times (though in
the gmane preview the dot looks a bit low). In the mean time, I came up
with the method below that worked for my purpose.
Jon
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from matplotlib.ticker import FuncFormatter
d
2010/10/19 David Pine :
> I like the times symbol but others prefer the dot (which I missed in the
> gmane preview!). So I like your suggestion of providing an option to use
> either \cdot or \times.
Okay, I'll try to look into it next week, is that okay with you both?
I don't want to do it now
I like the times symbol but others prefer the dot (which I missed in the gmane
preview!). So I like your suggestion of providing an option to use either
\cdot or \times.
David
On Oct 19, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote:
> What about inserting \cdot, that's the scientific notation I
What about inserting \cdot, that's the scientific notation I do prefer?
If I'm not mistaken that's what I did that time, might be unreadable
in the preview? I checked, when you look close you see the dot in
gmane preview.
We can make this customisable, with \times as an alternative option.
Frie
I agree with Jonathan and would very much like to see this feature implemented.
The example shown in the thread didn't show the "×" symbol, however, which
would be nice to have -- e.g. it should read 2.0 × 10² rather than 2.0 10².
David
On Oct 19, 2010, at 1:08 PM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote:
2010/10/18 Jonathan Slavin :
> I'm wondering if there's some relatively automatic way to have the
> ticklabels to come out in scientific notation for an axis that uses a
> linear scale (and has a range that warrants scientific notation)? For
> example, an axis that goes from 0 to 2.E18 by default
Hi,
I'm wondering if there's some relatively automatic way to have the
ticklabels to come out in scientific notation for an axis that uses a
linear scale (and has a range that warrants scientific notation)? For
example, an axis that goes from 0 to 2.E18 by default uses the labels 0,
0.5, 1.0, 1.5
