Eric Firing wrote:
> On 05/18/2011 09:01 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Using scatter, it seems less probably (numerous) points show just as much as
>> more probable points. Can anyone suggest a good way to emphasize the more
>> probable points?
>
> This is what hexbin is for, although it takes the a
On 05/18/2011 09:01 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Using scatter, it seems less probably (numerous) points show just as much as
> more probable points. Can anyone suggest a good way to emphasize the more
> probable points?
Another idea: set alpha to something less than 1, maybe something like
0.3; the
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Using scatter, it seems less probably (numerous) points show just as much
> as
> more probable points. Can anyone suggest a good way to emphasize the more
> probable points?
>
> I was thinking maybe the easy way is just scale down the markers
On 05/18/2011 09:01 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Using scatter, it seems less probably (numerous) points show just as much as
> more probable points. Can anyone suggest a good way to emphasize the more
> probable points?
This is what hexbin is for, although it takes the additional step of
showing po
Using scatter, it seems less probably (numerous) points show just as much as
more probable points. Can anyone suggest a good way to emphasize the more
probable points?
I was thinking maybe the easy way is just scale down the markers. Drawback may
be too many points plotted.
Colors would be n
