Le lundi 14 juillet 2008 à 09:08 -0400, Michael Droettboom a écrit :
> Do any other developers have better suggestions? We may have to do some
> magic in at drawing time (or convince the autoscaler to ignore the stem
> lines) -- but I'd like to find a way that minimizes additional complexity.
>
This is a tricky one. It appears this bug also exists in 0.91.x,
perhaps earlier as well, so it isn't a regression.
I don't like the idea of setting the minimum to "1", especially for when
the scale isn't log. Setting it to a really small positive value (like
1e-9) is better, but the autoscal
