On 01/03/2011 05:29 PM, Ryan May wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Ryan May wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Xavier Gnata
>>> wrote:
"/usr/local/lib/python3.1/dist-packages/matplotlib/backends/qt4_editor/formlayout.py"
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Ryan May wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Xavier Gnata wrote:
>>> "/usr/local/lib/python3.1/dist-packages/matplotlib/backends/qt4_editor/formlayout.py",
>>> line 59, in
>>> from PyQt4.QtCore impor
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Ryan May wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Xavier Gnata wrote:
>> which backend should we use?
>> It does not work with pyqt4
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "", line 1, in
>> File "/usr/local/lib/python3.1/dist-packages/pylab.py", lin
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Xavier Gnata wrote:
> which backend should we use?
> It does not work with pyqt4
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> File "/usr/local/lib/python3.1/dist-packages/pylab.py", line 1, in
>
> from matplotlib.pylab import *
> File
gt; -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Gohlke [mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 2:47 PM
> To: matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Matplotlib-users] Python 3
>
>
>
> On 12/23/2010 1:01 PM, Robert Young wrote:
>&g
rsday, December 23, 2010 2:47 PM
To: matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Matplotlib-users] Python 3
On 12/23/2010 1:01 PM, Robert Young wrote:
> Hi, I have used Matplotlib extensively now for 2 years with python
2.x.
> I recently needed to move to python 3.1 which was greatly
On 12/23/2010 1:01 PM, Robert Young wrote:
> Hi, I have used Matplotlib extensively now for 2 years with python 2.x.
> I recently needed to move to python 3.1 which was greatly facilitated by
> numpy and scipy being ported to python 3. I was lucky in that all I have
> to change is many print stat
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Xavier Gnata wrote:
> I'm not a svn expert but I get an error when I try to checkout the py3k
> branch:
> svn: Repository moved temporarily to '/viewvc/matplotlib/branches/';
> please relocate
> Any clues?
That URL was a link to the web view of SVN. You need to ch
On 09/25/2010 12:02 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>
>> The one called Py3k :)
>>
>> http://matplotlib.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/matplotlib/branches/py3k/
>>
>>
> In case you want to have ipython while testing, there's already an
> experimenta
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>
> The one called Py3k :)
>
> http://matplotlib.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/matplotlib/branches/py3k/
>
In case you want to have ipython while testing, there's already an
experimental py3k branch of ipython as well:
http://github.com/takowl/ipytho
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Xavier Gnata wrote:
> On 09/21/2010 04:13 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:22 AM, A. S. Budden wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Now that NumPy is available for python 3.1 and SciPy is well on its
>>> way (apparently), are there any plans for matplotlib t
On 09/21/2010 04:13 PM, Ryan May wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:22 AM, A. S. Budden wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Now that NumPy is available for python 3.1 and SciPy is well on its
>> way (apparently), are there any plans for matplotlib to be ported?
>>
> There are definitely plans; in fact,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:22 AM, A. S. Budden wrote:
> All,
>
> Now that NumPy is available for python 3.1 and SciPy is well on its
> way (apparently), are there any plans for matplotlib to be ported?
There are definitely plans; in fact, there's a SVN branch for it.
There are no major impediments
13 matches
Mail list logo
