On Monday 11 January 2010, Nico Schlömer elucidated thus:
> quick question from a Python noob:
> Suppose I have an instance of an object of matplotlib, Is there any
> way to check on its type, e.g., whether it is an instance of
> matplotlib.axes.AxesSubplots?
Python's built-in 'isintance.'
isinst
I've sent two messages to this list, and neither have appeared in the
archives, or come back to me. Did I use the right combination of words
to get stopped by a spam filter? :)
j
--
Joshua Kugler
Part-Time System Admin/Programmer
http://www.eeinternet.com
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ID 0xDB
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Joshua J. Kugler said something like:
> I've sent two messages to this list, and neither have appeared in the
> archives, or come back to me. Did I use the right combination of
> words to get stopped by a spam filter? :)
Sigh, apparently. I'll t
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Joshua J. Kugler said something like:
> On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Joshua J. Kugler said something like:
> > I've sent two messages to this list, and neither have appeared in
> > the archives, or come back to me. Did I use the right combination
[Trying one more time.]
I've read docs, search the list archive, and tried to step through code.
How can I set things like xtick.labelsize and ytick.labelsize via the
object oriented interface? I have a graph object, and I can't find
anywhere in the data structure for the completed graph wh
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, John Hunter said something like:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Joshua J. Kugler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [Trying one more time.]
> >
> > I've read docs, search the list archive, and tried to step through
> > code.
>
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, you said something like:
> Hello,
>
> I have found that messages sometimes don't show up on these lists if
> your options are set not to receive mailings (eg. if you just want to
> look for replies in the archive).
Hmm, well, I do receive mail from that list, so it mus
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Joshua J. Kugler said something like:
> > Here is one way to do it::
> >
> > for label in ax.get_xticklabels() + ax.get_yticklabels():
> >label.set_fontsize(12)
> >
> > But the artist tutorial above will give you a
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Stan West said something like:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joshua J. Kugler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 18:39
> >
> > On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Joshua J. Kugler said something like:
&g
With the help of John Hunter and Stan West, I got some of my tick labels
sizing correctly. I have this chunk of code:
for label in self.main_axes.get_xticklabels():
label.set_fontsize(self.xtick_labelsize)
main_ticks = self.main_axes.get_yticklabels()
sub_ticks = (self.sub_axes.get_yticklab
On Friday 07 November 2008, John Hunter said something like:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Joshua J. Kugler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With the help of John Hunter and Stan West, I got some of my tick
> > labels sizing correctly. I have this chunk of code:
On Saturday 08 November 2008, John Hunter said something like:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Joshua J. Kugler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 07 November 2008, John Hunter said something like:
> >
> > http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/faq/troubleshooting_fa
On Saturday 08 November 2008, John Hunter said something like:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Joshua J. Kugler
> > Sorry, I wasn't so much reporting a problem with matplotlib as I
> > was wondering if I was missing something.
Turns out I was missing something: it was the
On Sunday 16 November 2008, John Hunter said something like:
> When you share an axis, the formatters and locators are shared as
> well. I'm not sure if this is idea, but this is the way it is. If
> you want to turn off the tick labels for ax2, the trick is to make
> them invisible, because the t
On Sunday 16 November 2008, John Hunter said something like:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Joshua J. Kugler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am leaning toward this being a true bug. If you take a look at
> > attached plot (the code for which is where I first noticed
So, my code has been running without flaw for quite some time now, and
thanks to the help of some folks here a few months back, I'm learning
more about matplotlib. But today I hit a wall.
Under matplotlib 0.91.2/Py2.5, I'm getting this graph:
http://joshuakugler.com/images/good_graph.png
Very
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, John Hunter said something like:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Joshua J. Kugler
wrote:
> > So, my code has been running without flaw for quite some time now,
> > and thanks to the help of some folks here a few months back, I'm
> > lear
Installing an egg today, I got this message from easy_install:
/usr/bin/easy_install:5: UserWarning: Module dateutil was already imported
from
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib-0.87.7-py2.4-linux-i686.egg/dateutil/__init__.pyc,
but /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/python_dateutil-1.1
On Thursday 05 April 2007 17:04, Andrew Straw wrote:
> Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> > Installing an egg today, I got this message from easy_install:
> >
> > /usr/bin/easy_install:5: UserWarning: Module dateutil was already
> > imported from
> > /usr/lib/python2.4/site
We had some working code were were using with 0.87, but when we try to use it
with 0.90, we get the following error:
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/EEIGraph/BaseGraph.py", line 250,
in plotDate
line = self.main_axes.plot_date( g[:,0], g[:,1] )
File
"/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 15:49, Eric Firing wrote:
> It is a bug that is fixed in svn. The "this" part of the names is
> incorrect. The revised function is:
>
>
> def xaxis_date(self, tz=None):
> """Sets up x-axis ticks and labels that treat the x data as dates.
>
> tz is
Disclaimer: I do know Python, but am not terribly familiar with Matplotlib as
I'm taking over the maintenance of our graphing libraries. This post is
likely to leave out details that you need to help diagnose the problem, but I
didn't think posting all 1500 or so lines of our graphing routines
On Thursday 11 October 2007 17:41, Stephen George wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
>
> > As you can see from the attached graph, there is a break the in graph
> > somewhere around 7 AM or so. This is the data I am graphing for that red
> > line:
> >
> > "2007-10-09 00:00:00",0.015
> > "2007-10-09 01:00:00",0.0
23 matches
Mail list logo
