Mark Bakker wrote:
Eric -
Yeah, I agree. The words 'equal' is confusing. But it was taken from
matlab. 'scaled' was my invention/doing. I thought it was better than
'equal', as it makes the scales equal on both axes. Either way, I would
like it if we can fix the data limits in a simple
Thanks Eric. I'll give it a shot,
Mark
On 1/6/07, Eric Firing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Bakker wrote:
Eric -
Yeah, I agree. The words 'equal' is confusing. But it was taken from
matlab. 'scaled' was my invention/doing. I thought it was better than
'equal', as it makes the scales equal
Eric -
Yeah, I agree. The words 'equal' is confusing. But it was taken from matlab.
'scaled' was my invention/doing. I thought it was better than 'equal', as it
makes the scales equal on both axes. Either way, I would like it if we can
fix the data limits in a simple way, and I think
The enhanced way of handling aspect ratios that Eric implemented works
great.
There is, however, one change from the old implementation that I don't like.
In the old implementation, when setting axis('scaled') it also turned
autoscale off.
This makes sense (and I used it a lot). It means that
Mark Bakker wrote:
The enhanced way of handling aspect ratios that Eric implemented works
great.
There is, however, one change from the old implementation that I don't like.
In the old implementation, when setting axis('scaled') it also turned
autoscale off.
This makes sense (and I used
