On 08/31/2011 01:20 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
On 08/31/2011 06:45 AM, Jeffrey Blackburne wrote:
Hi,
Are the edges of the rectangles returned by plt.bar() supposed to conform to
the 'lines.solid_joinstyle' rcParam? If not, is there another method for
specifying that joinstyle?
I have not
On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:20 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
On 08/31/2011 06:45 AM, Jeffrey Blackburne wrote:
Hi,
Are the edges of the rectangles returned by plt.bar() supposed to conform
to the 'lines.solid_joinstyle' rcParam? If not, is there another
On 09/06/2011 04:48 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:20 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
On 08/31/2011 06:45 AM, Jeffrey Blackburne wrote:
Hi,
Are the edges of the rectangles returned by plt.bar() supposed to conform
to the 'lines.solid_joinstyle' rcParam? If not, is there another
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Jeffrey Blackburne
jblackbu...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
It would be nice to have. Since the patch edge seemed to be using a round
style and I wanted miter, my workaround was just to use a separate step
plot to overlay the outline. But for more general cases (e.g.,
Hi,
Are the edges of the rectangles returned by plt.bar() supposed to conform to
the 'lines.solid_joinstyle' rcParam? If not, is there another method for
specifying that joinstyle?
I have not been able to change the joinstyle using this method in versions
1.0.0 (linux, gtkagg and tkagg) or
On 08/31/2011 06:45 AM, Jeffrey Blackburne wrote:
Hi,
Are the edges of the rectangles returned by plt.bar() supposed to conform to
the 'lines.solid_joinstyle' rcParam? If not, is there another method for
specifying that joinstyle?
I have not been able to change the joinstyle using this
