Re: [Matplotlib-users] Any progress on binary installer for OSX?

2013-10-11 Thread Matthew Brett 
Hi,

On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Matthew Brett  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Matthew Brett  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Russell E. Owen  wrote:
>>> In article
>>> ,
>>>  Matthew Brett 
>>>  wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Michael Droettboom
  wrote:
 > Matthew Terry, as part of his Mac testing project, has done a great deal 
 > of
 > reconnaissance on this.
 >
 > https://github.com/matplotlib/mpl_mac_testing
 >
 > I know he was looking into statically linking some of the C dependencies
 > (freetype, libpng etc.) as a way to make the installer more robust to
 > different environments.

 Thanks - that looks like a useful testing grid.

 Are there any near-term plans for something like a .dmg or .mpkg or
 .pkg installer?
>>>
>>> Building a binary installer with statically linked libraries is not
>>> terribly hard (see
>>> >> l>). There are two problem:
>>> - As of 1.3.0 mpl does not include python-dateutil, pytz or six (for
>>> good reasons) and that makes it harder to make a really usable binary
>>> installer. This interacts with the next problem:
>>> - For unknown reasons running the 1.3.0 installer breaks existing
>>> installations of python-dateutil if those packages were installed using
>>> an older mpl binary installer.
>>>
>>> The missing packages can be added to the binary installer after it is
>>> produced by bdist_mpkg by post-processing the mpkg. That would take care
>>> of the second issue for most users (who would use the default
>>> installation and get everything). I have not had time to deal with that.
>>> Thus I never uploaded an official binary installer for 1.3.0 and stopped
>>> providing them. Matthew Terry has taken over that task.
>>
>> Aha - yes - postprocessing the mpkg would be pretty easy.
>>
>> So - I guess I should just build the installer myself and post it for
>> testing?  Is that the best way forward?
>
> OK - after a lot of blood, sweat and tears:
>
> http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/practical_neuroimaging/matplotlib-1.3.1-py2.7-macosx10.6.mpkg.zip
>
> - a standalone binary installer for matplotlib 1.3.1, including:
>
> tornado
> pyparsing
> python-dateutil
> pytz
> six
>
> Please do test.
>
> It imports on my machines (10.6, 10.7 * 2, 10.8), I am just running the tests.
>
> I'm building from a waf build that should be replicable:
>
> https://github.com/matthew-brett/mpl-osx-binaries
>
> On a 10.6 and a 10.8 machine I get a couple of test errors, log attached:
>
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_backend_pgf.test_pathclip
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_backend_pgf.test_mixedmode
>
> One (clean) 10.7 passes, another 10.7 machine gives the same errors as
> above plus 2 ghostscript errors.

python3.3 installer, same errors as 2.7 for OSX 10.8:

http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/practical_neuroimaging/matplotlib-1.3.1-py3.3-macosx10.6.mpkg.zip

I've attached the log this time (for 2.7, it's similar for 3.3)

Best,

Matthew


mpl.log.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users

Re: [Matplotlib-users] Any progress on binary installer for OSX?

2013-10-11 Thread Matthew Brett 
Hi,

On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Matthew Brett  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Russell E. Owen  wrote:
>> In article
>> ,
>>  Matthew Brett 
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Michael Droettboom
>>>  wrote:
>>> > Matthew Terry, as part of his Mac testing project, has done a great deal 
>>> > of
>>> > reconnaissance on this.
>>> >
>>> > https://github.com/matplotlib/mpl_mac_testing
>>> >
>>> > I know he was looking into statically linking some of the C dependencies
>>> > (freetype, libpng etc.) as a way to make the installer more robust to
>>> > different environments.
>>>
>>> Thanks - that looks like a useful testing grid.
>>>
>>> Are there any near-term plans for something like a .dmg or .mpkg or
>>> .pkg installer?
>>
>> Building a binary installer with statically linked libraries is not
>> terribly hard (see
>> > l>). There are two problem:
>> - As of 1.3.0 mpl does not include python-dateutil, pytz or six (for
>> good reasons) and that makes it harder to make a really usable binary
>> installer. This interacts with the next problem:
>> - For unknown reasons running the 1.3.0 installer breaks existing
>> installations of python-dateutil if those packages were installed using
>> an older mpl binary installer.
>>
>> The missing packages can be added to the binary installer after it is
>> produced by bdist_mpkg by post-processing the mpkg. That would take care
>> of the second issue for most users (who would use the default
>> installation and get everything). I have not had time to deal with that.
>> Thus I never uploaded an official binary installer for 1.3.0 and stopped
>> providing them. Matthew Terry has taken over that task.
>
> Aha - yes - postprocessing the mpkg would be pretty easy.
>
> So - I guess I should just build the installer myself and post it for
> testing?  Is that the best way forward?

OK - after a lot of blood, sweat and tears:

http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/practical_neuroimaging/matplotlib-1.3.1-py2.7-macosx10.6.mpkg.zip

- a standalone binary installer for matplotlib 1.3.1, including:

tornado
pyparsing
python-dateutil
pytz
six

Please do test.

It imports on my machines (10.6, 10.7 * 2, 10.8), I am just running the tests.

I'm building from a waf build that should be replicable:

https://github.com/matthew-brett/mpl-osx-binaries

On a 10.6 and a 10.8 machine I get a couple of test errors, log attached:

ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_backend_pgf.test_pathclip
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_backend_pgf.test_mixedmode

One (clean) 10.7 passes, another 10.7 machine gives the same errors as
above plus 2 ghostscript errors.

Cheers,

Matthew

--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users

Re: [Matplotlib-users] Any progress on binary installer for OSX?

2013-10-03 Thread Matthew Brett 
Hi,

On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Russell E. Owen  wrote:
> In article
> ,
>  Matthew Brett 
>  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Michael Droettboom
>>  wrote:
>> > Matthew Terry, as part of his Mac testing project, has done a great deal of
>> > reconnaissance on this.
>> >
>> > https://github.com/matplotlib/mpl_mac_testing
>> >
>> > I know he was looking into statically linking some of the C dependencies
>> > (freetype, libpng etc.) as a way to make the installer more robust to
>> > different environments.
>>
>> Thanks - that looks like a useful testing grid.
>>
>> Are there any near-term plans for something like a .dmg or .mpkg or
>> .pkg installer?
>
> Building a binary installer with statically linked libraries is not
> terribly hard (see
>  l>). There are two problem:
> - As of 1.3.0 mpl does not include python-dateutil, pytz or six (for
> good reasons) and that makes it harder to make a really usable binary
> installer. This interacts with the next problem:
> - For unknown reasons running the 1.3.0 installer breaks existing
> installations of python-dateutil if those packages were installed using
> an older mpl binary installer.
>
> The missing packages can be added to the binary installer after it is
> produced by bdist_mpkg by post-processing the mpkg. That would take care
> of the second issue for most users (who would use the default
> installation and get everything). I have not had time to deal with that.
> Thus I never uploaded an official binary installer for 1.3.0 and stopped
> providing them. Matthew Terry has taken over that task.

Aha - yes - postprocessing the mpkg would be pretty easy.

So - I guess I should just build the installer myself and post it for
testing?  Is that the best way forward?

Cheers,

Matthew

--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users

Re: [Matplotlib-users] Any progress on binary installer for OSX?

2013-10-03 Thread Russell E. Owen 
In article 
,
 Matthew Brett  
 wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Michael Droettboom 
>  wrote:
> > Matthew Terry, as part of his Mac testing project, has done a great deal of
> > reconnaissance on this.
> >
> > https://github.com/matplotlib/mpl_mac_testing
> >
> > I know he was looking into statically linking some of the C dependencies
> > (freetype, libpng etc.) as a way to make the installer more robust to
> > different environments.
> 
> Thanks - that looks like a useful testing grid.
> 
> Are there any near-term plans for something like a .dmg or .mpkg or
> .pkg installer?

Building a binary installer with statically linked libraries is not 
terribly hard (see 
). There are two problem:
- As of 1.3.0 mpl does not include python-dateutil, pytz or six (for 
good reasons) and that makes it harder to make a really usable binary 
installer. This interacts with the next problem:
- For unknown reasons running the 1.3.0 installer breaks existing 
installations of python-dateutil if those packages were installed using 
an older mpl binary installer.

The missing packages can be added to the binary installer after it is 
produced by bdist_mpkg by post-processing the mpkg. That would take care 
of the second issue for most users (who would use the default 
installation and get everything). I have not had time to deal with that. 
Thus I never uploaded an official binary installer for 1.3.0 and stopped 
providing them. Matthew Terry has taken over that task.

I did put an unofficial binary installer for 1.3.0 here:

just be prepared to reinstall python-dateutil after you use it.

-- Russell


--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users

Re: [Matplotlib-users] Any progress on binary installer for OSX?

2013-10-03 Thread Matthew Brett 
Hi,

On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Michael Droettboom  wrote:
> Matthew Terry, as part of his Mac testing project, has done a great deal of
> reconnaissance on this.
>
> https://github.com/matplotlib/mpl_mac_testing
>
> I know he was looking into statically linking some of the C dependencies
> (freetype, libpng etc.) as a way to make the installer more robust to
> different environments.

Thanks - that looks like a useful testing grid.

Are there any near-term plans for something like a .dmg or .mpkg or
.pkg installer?

Cheers,

Matthew

--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users

Re: [Matplotlib-users] Any progress on binary installer for OSX?

2013-10-03 Thread Michael Droettboom 
Matthew Terry, as part of his Mac testing project, has done a great deal 
of reconnaissance on this.


https://github.com/matplotlib/mpl_mac_testing

I know he was looking into statically linking some of the C dependencies 
(freetype, libpng etc.) as a way to make the installer more robust to 
different environments.


Mike

On 10/02/2013 04:15 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:

Hi,

Anything I can do to help get a binary installer for OSX?

If I wanted to build one myself - is there a good place to start
looking to understand the problems?

Cheers,

Matthew

--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users



--
   _
|\/|o _|_  _. _ | | \.__  __|__|_|_  _  _ ._ _
|  ||(_| |(_|(/_| |_/|(_)(/_|_ |_|_)(_)(_)| | |

http://www.droettboom.com

--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users