> "belinda" == belinda thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
belinda> I am not sure, but I think this difference in behavior is
belinda> b/c IPython is a bit better about calling
belinda> draw_if_interactive after "most pylab functions" (see
belinda> Eric Firing's http://www.mail-ar
Mark,
> BTW, when you use pylab in interactive mode, the axis() command
> should scale your figure interactively, also under IDLE. Have you
> tried that?
Yes, I tried using axis in both IDLE and IPython. IPython's redrew
the axis automatically whereas IDLE's did not.
I am not sure, but I t
> "belinda" == belinda thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
belinda> Hi,
belinda> I've been playing w/both IDLE and IPython, using TkAgg in
belinda> both cases as the back end. Also, I've got the latest
belinda> matplotlib and ipython versions and am using MacPython's
belinda>
> "belinda" == belinda thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
belinda> I can create plots to my hearts content in both, but when
belinda> I ask to rescale the plots, e.g. axis([-.2,2.4,-2,2.4]),
belinda> NOTHING happens to the figure drawn via IDLE, whereas the
belinda> command work
I have experienced the same problem with IDLE.
It only works with -n, but then you lose the nice feature of 'starting
over'.
Does anybody know a fix so we can do both?
Thanks,
Mark
BTW, when you use pylab in interactive mode, the axis() command should scale
your figure interactively, also under I
I had the same problem about figures that freeze using IDLE and
matplotlib but finally I manage to solve it with the help of Eric and
also a bit of luck.
Instead of using TkAgg I use WxAgg and it never hangs.
I use Idle -n and in the matplotlibrc set Interactive
I use all latest version of Numpy
