Re:Re: 3 other variations of the OPF formulation to Matpower

2018-01-25 Thread wandlf
Hi Baljinnyam, violently thanks for your working as to Matpower. I suppose it will be great for adding this functions that you have developed. Further discussion about this kinds of questions will be greatly useful. sinoy At 2018-01-25 22:47:21, "Ray Zimmerman" wrote: Hi Baljinnyam

Re: 3 other variations of the OPF formulation to Matpower

2018-01-25 Thread Ray Zimmerman
Thanks, don’t hesitate to contact me for feedback along the way. More frequent feedback earlier in the process is always helpful to avoid the need for major modifications later on. Thanks again, Ray > On Jan 25, 2018, at 11:09 AM, Baljinnyam Sereeter > wrote: > > On 01/25/2018 03:47 PM

Re: 3 other variations of the OPF formulation to Matpower

2018-01-25 Thread Baljinnyam Sereeter
On 01/25/2018 03:47 PM, Ray Zimmerman wrote: Hi Baljinnyam, Thanks for your offer to contribute. This would be a nice addition to MATPOWER. I suggest starting by adding two new MATPOWER options, each with default values of 0 … opf.current_balance = 0 (complex power balance) or 1 (complex c

Re: 3 other variations of the OPF formulation to Matpower

2018-01-25 Thread Ray Zimmerman
Hi Baljinnyam, Thanks for your offer to contribute. This would be a nice addition to MATPOWER. I suggest starting by adding two new MATPOWER options, each with default values of 0 … opf.current_balance = 0 (complex power balance) or 1 (complex current balance) opf.v_cartesian = 0 (polar) or 1 (