Thanks, Baljinnyam. This is definitely helpful to have. I will certainly want
to make these derivations available as well when we integrate code to implement
these variations into MATPOWER. At that point we can discuss whether it makes
sense to do it as a modification to TN2 or as a new
On 02/01/2018 02:55 PM, Baljinnyam Sereeter wrote:
On 01/25/2018 05:09 PM, Baljinnyam Sereeter wrote:
Hi Baljinnyam,
Thanks for your offer to contribute. This would be a nice addition to
MATPOWER.
I suggest starting by adding two new MATPOWER options, each with
default values of 0 …
On 01/25/2018 05:09 PM, Baljinnyam Sereeter wrote:
Hi Baljinnyam,
Thanks for your offer to contribute. This would be a nice addition to
MATPOWER.
I suggest starting by adding two new MATPOWER options, each with
default values of 0 …
opf.current_balance = 0 (complex power balance) or 1