Re: 3 other variations of the OPF formulation to Matpower

2018-02-02 Thread Ray Zimmerman
Thanks, Baljinnyam. This is definitely helpful to have. I will certainly want to make these derivations available as well when we integrate code to implement these variations into MATPOWER. At that point we can discuss whether it makes sense to do it as a modification to TN2 or as a new

Re: 3 other variations of the OPF formulation to Matpower

2018-02-02 Thread Baljinnyam Sereeter
On 02/01/2018 02:55 PM, Baljinnyam Sereeter wrote: On 01/25/2018 05:09 PM, Baljinnyam Sereeter wrote: Hi Baljinnyam, Thanks for your offer to contribute. This would be a nice addition to MATPOWER. I suggest starting by adding two new MATPOWER options, each with default values of 0 …

Re: 3 other variations of the OPF formulation to Matpower

2018-02-01 Thread Baljinnyam Sereeter
On 01/25/2018 05:09 PM, Baljinnyam Sereeter wrote: Hi Baljinnyam, Thanks for your offer to contribute. This would be a nice addition to MATPOWER. I suggest starting by adding two new MATPOWER options, each with default values of 0 … opf.current_balance = 0 (complex power balance) or 1

Re: 3 other variations of the OPF formulation to Matpower

2018-01-25 Thread Baljinnyam Sereeter
On 01/25/2018 03:47 PM, Ray Zimmerman wrote: Hi Baljinnyam, Thanks for your offer to contribute. This would be a nice addition to MATPOWER. I suggest starting by adding two new MATPOWER options, each with default values of 0 … opf.current_balance = 0 (complex power balance) or 1 (complex