Re: Different results with MATPOWER and PSAT

2015-11-20 Thread Jose Luis Marin
I'll add my 2 cents. I don't know PSAT, but I can attest to the difficulty in reproducing exactly the same powerflow solution in two different software tools, in general. First you have to find out how many features are implemented and enabled/disabled in each tool; but more importantly, you have

Re: Different results with MATPOWER and PSAT

2015-11-20 Thread Yogess H Singh
Shruti and Jose, Thank you so much, that helped a lot. Best Regards, *Yogesh Kumar* *Graduate Research Assistant* *NE 2042, EECS Department* *University of Toledo, OH 43507* *+1 (419)530-8295 <%2B1%20%28419%29450-2217>* On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Jose Luis Marin

Different results with MATPOWER and PSAT

2015-11-19 Thread Yogess H Singh
Dear Fellow Member, I ran load flow analysis on a IEEE-14 bus system using MATPOWER, PSAT and PowerWorld. Voltage magnitudes as well as phases have slightly different values in all three tools. However, the difference is not much but I want to know what causes difference among results obtained

Re: Different results with MATPOWER and PSAT

2015-11-19 Thread Shruti Rao
If the system parameters are the same, it could be because the tolerance levels that were set for the different software were different i.e. the default power balance mismatch tolerances are not always the same in all software. Also probably if the VAR limits are active for PV buses, different