I have to agree with Ted on this one. It is a little longer, but much
clearer, when we use .opt.
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Mav-user] PROPOSAL: Add Ted Husted as committer
>
+1. I've been traveling through California the last few days.
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Mav-user] PROPOSAL: Move java packaging to net.sf.mav.*
> Mike Moulton wrote:
> >
Schnitzer, Jeff wrote:
How about getting rid of the opt and just have packages like this:
net.sf.mav.formproc.*
I'd suggest keeping the opt. It's helpful to clearly delineate the
Maverick core from packages like this, which extend the Controller core
for a specialized use. One of the nice things
Mike Moulton wrote:
I'm all for a repackaging. While were at it, are there any other changes
that have been lingering that could get incorporated into a new release.
Personally there are a few things I have intended to look into. Most
notably I want to add support for Xalan's XSLTC in the XSL tr
