Hello Pavel,
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 11:53 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
It is clear that this happens only of smbfs support is enabled.
Why? Because you can only reproduce it once you enable smbfs?
I see several solutions to this problem:
1) The user arranges for her/his network setup to be
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 11:53 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
It is clear that this happens only of smbfs support is enabled.
Why? Because you can only reproduce it once you enable smbfs?
1) The backtrace shows it.
2) If i had smbfs disabled
Hi Pavel,
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 14:49 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
1) The backtrace shows it.
Yes, but that doesn't mean it couldn't hang elsewhere. Hence my
question.
2) If i had smbfs disabled (and I do) i wasn't able to reproduce
the slowdown.
Right.
3) There are not gethostbyname()
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 14:49 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
1) The backtrace shows it.
Yes, but that doesn't mean it couldn't hang elsewhere. Hence my
question.
I think, but I am not sure, that the rest of the gethostbyname() and
related calls
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 15:26 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
I've notified Andrew Samoilov about this discussion. I suggest that we
wait for his opinion on this matter.
Ok. By the way, if neither my_name nor ip are set we can safely return
before the call to gethostname().
Leonard.
--
mount
Hi Pavel,
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 14:56 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 14:29 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Can we avoid any highlighting? I think Far Manager does it right:
http://red-bean.com/proski/mc/far.png
Attaching the
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 14:56 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 14:29 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Can we avoid any highlighting? I think Far Manager does it right:
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 05:13:29PM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
There is no need to profile MC. It is not speedup in terms of CPU
cycles but in reduced screen update i.e. why paint the frame each time
if it really doesn't change at all.
it should
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Yes. I understood that the first time through. There was a similiar bug
report already.
The question is: why MC is doing DNS queries? Is possible to
disable them?
