On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
I don't think so, and I don't think it is worth it. Maintaining two backends
IMHO just causes headaches while it doesn't make mc better. I still can't
see why
On Monday 12 June 2006 10:55, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Please take notice. It would probably be good if Vladimir and you could
keep your UTF-8 patch sets in sync. It just seems wasted effort to do
this in two places independently. Some inter-distro communication is not
going to hurt. Maybe
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote:
BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
I don't think so, and I don't think it is worth it. Maintaining two backends
IMHO just causes headaches while it
Hello!
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:45 +1200, Bart Oldeman wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote:
BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
I don't think so, and I don't think it is worth
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 09:45:26AM +1200, Bart Oldeman wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote:
BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
I don't think so, and I don't think it is worth it.
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
I don't think so, and I don't think it is worth it. Maintaining two backends
IMHO just causes headaches while it
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:45 +1200, Bart Oldeman wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote:
BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
I don't
