Any news on it? Or at least please fix the regression, if not add new feature.
On Tue, 23 May 2006 15:44:30 +0300 (EEST) Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:42:45PM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
I guess in
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Nerijus Baliunas wrote:
Any news on it? Or at least please fix the regression, if not add new feature.
Oops. Sorry, I forgot about that. I'll try to commit a fix in the weekend.
___
Mc-devel mailing list
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 14:08 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi mc-devel,
attaching a simple patch that highlights obsolete RPM tags with white
color so that it helps the spec file editor to be better aware of the
fact they are obsolete for several years and shouldn't be used.
The patch was in
Hello,
The MC subshell while being a nice feature has been the source of many
problems as well. I've been following this list and the MC development for
a while and I can tell that the problems caused by the subshell are the
hardest to track down and eliminate. Trough the years many fixes were
Update of bug #15461 (project mc):
Status:None = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Jindrich Novy wrote:
attaching a simple patch that highlights obsolete RPM tags with white
color so that it helps the spec file editor to be better aware of the
fact they are obsolete for several years and shouldn't be used.
The patch was in the reversed order,
Hi Andy,
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 17:22 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Jindrich Novy пишет:
My $0.02 to specfile highliting.
The mc shipped with FC4 doesn't handle correctly the case-insensivity
tags. For example, BuildArch and Buildarch are highliting differently,
but rpm recognize both.
I
Hi Pavel,
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 17:33 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Jindrich Novy wrote:
attaching a simple patch that highlights obsolete RPM tags with white
color so that it helps the spec file editor to be better aware of the
fact they are obsolete for several years
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:29:35PM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
There are several features which are consistent source of problems:
My opinion is that we should remove both features from the subshell.
* the subshell prompt retrieval - this one is widely known to be
unreliable.
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:29:35PM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
There are several features which are consistent source of problems:
My opinion is that we should remove both features from the subshell.
* the subshell prompt retrieval - this one
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 09:58:08PM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:29:35PM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
There are several features which are consistent source of problems:
My opinion is that we should remove both features
11 matches
Mail list logo
