urity or not, whether you want to make it
less paranoid or not.
--
Best regards,
KonstantÃn
On 11 March 2017 at 19:57, Egmont Koblinger <egm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Key Offecka <key.offe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>
Hi,
> You did mention "sudo" a couple of times
Yes, I did. And maybe even more times, but I never told about extra rights
obtained by a user just because of sudoing.
> You keep talking about "first" and "second" user, in order to have these
you must switch user by some means
And I told you, in
Hi Egmont,
> What do you mean the tty owner is the _problem_? What kind of problem?
Please excuse me, I wasn't quite correct there.
Let's forget about permissions and TTYs. Let's look at the issue from the
user point of view. Please consider this case:
There is a user, say `echo` and there is
ope this explains the situation.
>
> I'm not sure why something is checked twice, but it can easily be in order
> to avoid a race condition (or could easily be a harmless bug as well).
>
> egmont
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Key Offecka <key.offe...@gmail.com>
&g
Hi,
I am looking at the
main (int argc, char **argv)
function in
src/consaver/cons.saver.c
There are calls like
st.st_uid != uid
fstat (console_fd, ) >= 0 && st.st_uid == uid
fstat (console_fd, ) < 0 || st.st_uid != uid
The last one is especially strange taking into account that it
