* Slava Zanko slavaza...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi,
To me not. In really small systems better to use busybox without mc. Or
just older versions of mc...
What a great suggestion ;-o
Why not? For example: do you tried to run KDE4 under your embedded
hardware? I'm sure, you never think about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
ACK. But we also should have the traditional one built-in
as a compile-time option (for small systems).
Small systems? In this case better way to use present libraries as
possible for lesser size binary file and for less
* Slava Zanko slavaza...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi,
Small systems? In this case better way to use present libraries as
possible for lesser size binary file and for less memory usage per one
process.
Assuming they're present at all.
For lots of my systems, mc is currently the *only* app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Small systems? In this case better way to use present libraries as
possible for lesser size binary file and for less memory usage per one
process.
Assuming they're present at all.
For lots of my systems, mc is
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* SZABÓ Gergely s...@subogero.com schrieb:
Actually mc implements a lot of CUA standards, but you seem to forget
about the Norton/Total/Far traditions. I think it's equally (or more)
important to conform to those traditions. Anybody who ever used a
two-pane
* MP t...@centrum.cz schrieb:
We could distribute multiple keybinding files aside of the
default one -one in which MC will mimick Total commander
keyboard shortcuts as close aspossible, one mimicking FAR
manager as close as possible, perhaps someother if someone
will send us something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
02.11.2009 19:23, y199mp1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Russian Team,
This is not right: Russian team was transform into international devel-team.
Please make sure you call your init/config files in a different way
from 4.6.1 or put them in a
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 21:06 +0200, Slava Zanko wrote:
Please make sure you call your init/config files in a different way
from 4.6.1 or put them in a different directory.
Is you mean moving mc.wrapper.csh|sh from /usr/share/mc into
/usr/libexec/mc ?
I think that he wants us to pick another
y199mp1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Russian Team,
Please make sure you call your init/config files in a different way
from 4.6.1 or put them in a different directory.
Right now your are modifying 'ini' without considering that users
may want to leave the old 4.6.1 install intact.
Further, it
* Yury V. Zaytsev y...@shurup.com schrieb:
I think that he wants us to pick another directory for configuration
files like .mc-new, but even in this case I can't really follow his
logic.
./configure --help ;-P
cu
--
-
* SZABÓ Gergely s...@subogero.com schrieb:
Actually mc implements a lot of CUA standards, but you seem to forget
about the Norton/Total/Far traditions. I think it's equally (or more)
important to conform to those traditions. Anybody who ever used a
two-pane file-manager knows by heart what
11 matches
Mail list logo
