Re: bundled intl stuff necessary

2009-01-03 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Andrew Borodin schrieb: > On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:14:21 +0100 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > * Andrew Borodin schrieb: > > > ${datarootdir}/mc" contains arch-independent files and > > > mc-specific files. It's correct place in terms of FHS. > > > > Are you *absolutely* sure they're always arch-indepen

Re: bundled intl stuff necessary

2009-01-03 Thread Andrew Borodin
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:14:21 +0100 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Andrew Borodin schrieb: > > ${datarootdir}/mc" contains arch-independent files and > > mc-specific files. It's correct place in terms of FHS. > > Are you *absolutely* sure they're always arch-independent At current time -- yes. > and ev

Re: bundled intl stuff necessary

2009-01-03 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Slava Zanko schrieb: > Contributor... gm... may be I'm mistaken with word... 'maintainer' more > like. > - - How make packages in rpm, deb, tgz(Slackware) and other > package-oriented distros > - - How compile on *BSD/MaCOS, Cygwin/MinGW > - - How compile on embedded systems > - - ... other mai

Re: bundled intl stuff necessary

2009-01-03 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Andrew Borodin schrieb: > On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:34:19 +0100 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > Why do extfs scripts belong into contrib ? > > > > BTW: they should be installed into "${libexecdir}/mc", not > > "${datarootdir}/mc". Same w/ the stuff in "${datarootdir}/mc/bin". > > Why? "${datarootdir}/m

Re: bundled intl stuff necessary

2009-01-03 Thread Slava Zanko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Enrico Weigelt wrote: >> My purpose (in far-near future): >> doc >> man (current ${src_root}/doc) >> contributor (contributor manuals) >> developer (developers manual) > > What exactly is the difference between developer and contributor ?

Re: bundled intl stuff necessary

2009-01-03 Thread Andrew Borodin
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:34:19 +0100 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Why do extfs scripts belong into contrib ? > > BTW: they should be installed into "${libexecdir}/mc", not > "${datarootdir}/mc". Same w/ the stuff in "${datarootdir}/mc/bin". Why? "${datarootdir}/mc" contains arch-independent files and mc

Re: bundled intl stuff necessary

2009-01-03 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Slava Zanko schrieb: Hi, > lib - in my mind must be sources of library(es) of project. > What we see in directory lib? ACK. Currently, it contains lots of stuff which clearly don't belong there, but instead something like man/doc/shared-data/whatever. > My purpose (in far-near future): > do

Re: bundled intl stuff necessary

2009-01-03 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Roland Illig schrieb: > Enrico Weigelt schrieb: > > Hi folks, > > > > is it necessary to have the intl lib bundled into mc or could it > > be taken directly from the system ? > > (I admit, I don't know much about how it really works ;-o) > > I don't think it is necessary. There are many other

Re: bundled intl stuff necessary

2008-12-31 Thread Slava Zanko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roland Illig wrote: > Enrico Weigelt schrieb: >> Hi folks, >> >> is it necessary to have the intl lib bundled into mc or could it >> be taken directly from the system ? >> (I admit, I don't know much about how it really works ;-o) > > I don't think it

Re: bundled intl stuff necessary

2008-12-31 Thread Roland Illig
Enrico Weigelt schrieb: > Hi folks, > > is it necessary to have the intl lib bundled into mc or could it > be taken directly from the system ? > (I admit, I don't know much about how it really works ;-o) I don't think it is necessary. There are many other projects who have dropped the internal in