Hello Marcel,
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 14:25 +0100, Marcel Pol wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
| The problem with Fedora using a 4.6.1a tarball is caused by the fact
| that Jindrich Novy didn't read pchel's message that HEAD is now a post
|
Hello Marcel, Jindrich,
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 14:25, Marcel Pol wrote:
A small problem that comes from that is that the utf8 patches are
developed against head now. There are a few rejects when applying to
current 4.6.1. Since I'm no C coder I'm not able to upgrade the Mandrake
package to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
| On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 14:25, Marcel Pol wrote:
|
|A small problem that comes from that is that the utf8 patches are
|developed against head now. There are a few rejects when applying to
|current 4.6.1. Since I'm no C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
| The problem with Fedora using a 4.6.1a tarball is caused by the fact
| that Jindrich Novy didn't read pchel's message that HEAD is now a post
| 4.6.1 branch and he should have been updating to MC_4_6_1_PRE instead.
A
Marcel Pol wrote:
A small problem that comes from that is that the utf8 patches are
developed against head now. There are a few rejects when applying to
current 4.6.1. Since I'm no C coder I'm not able to upgrade the Mandrake
package to current 4.6.1, and I'd rather not touch head.
The failed
Hello, all!
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 05:49, Pavel Shirshov (pchel) wrote:
Pavel Roskin doesn't release of mc-4.6.1-pre3 because:
-
mc exists when run remotely over ssh with X forwarding enabled:
. . .
I
Roland Illig wrote:
Pavel Shirshov (pchel) wrote:
RI By the way: NetBSD already has a current Midnight Commander
RI (4.6.1-pre2b), and although mcslang does not work at all, it was
RI easy to make it build and run, as there is also a `slang' package.
I'll see on NetBSD problem today.
Please
Hello Roland,
Thursday, February 10, 2005, 6:38:31 PM, you wrote:
Please don't. The mc runs fine on NetBSD, so we don't need a fix there.
RI I got a complaint about this statement and I regret it. I also fixed the
RI issue in the current CVS version.
Backported to mc-pre. Thx.
--
Best
Hi Roland,
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 21:39, Roland Illig wrote:
Sorry, I think I got this wrong. There was a weird numbering scheme, but
as Leonard told me today, it is the mc-4.6.1a (in configure.ac) that is
confusing.
I was somewhat mistaken. 4.6.1a is a valid tag for HEAD assuming this is
Hello Leonard,
Wednesday, February 9, 2005, 11:05:22 PM, you wrote:
LdO This is a newly introduced issue that is caused by a change in openssh.
LdO It should be fixed for the next release, BUT IT SHOULD NOT DELAY THE
LdO RELEASE OF 4.6.1.
I'm absolutely agree with you.
Pre isn't release. It's
Hi all, especially our project maintainers,
the release of a new MC version is long overdue. Also there has been
some confusion concerning our version numbering scheme, as some
distributions consider a version 4.6.1-pre3 to be higher than 4.6.1.
For these reasons I vote that the current
Hi Roland,
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 22:20, Roland Illig wrote:
the release of a new MC version is long overdue. Also there has been
some confusion concerning our version numbering scheme, as some
distributions consider a version 4.6.1-pre3 to be higher than 4.6.1.
Nope. The point is that at
Hello Roland,
Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 2:20:18 AM, you wrote:
RI the release of a new MC version is long overdue. Also there has been
RI some confusion concerning our version numbering scheme, as some
RI distributions consider a version 4.6.1-pre3 to be higher than 4.6.1.
mc numbering
13 matches
Mail list logo
