Re: mc editor small changes III - unified diff

2005-08-21 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi František, On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 09:07 +0200, František Řezníček wrote: -const char * const b = {}{[][()(, *p; +const char * const b = {}{[][()(, *p; -if (strchr ({[(, c)) +if (strchr ({[(, c)) If you'd like the extra match please implement this so the strings above are

Re: mc editor small changes III - unified diff

2005-08-15 Thread František Řezníček
aren't going to be available in C ? We may think about conditioning this feature, but it requires bigger changes to CoolEdit used in MC. Kind Regards, Frantisek Puvodni zprava Od: Jindrich Novy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Predmet: Re: mc editor small changes III - unified

Re: mc editor small changes III - unified diff

2005-08-14 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 11:08:48PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 15:25, Jindrich Novy wrote: I can imagine the enhancement can be useful for XML/HTML/PHP, etc. but maybe it could be a configurable feature if considered to be committed at all. I like that

Re: mc editor small changes III - unified diff

2005-08-14 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:03:25PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: i think it should be part of the syntax definition, which would be extended from highlighting only. This is not about highlighting, the highlighting is a side effect of the jump to matching bracket option. This code

Re: mc editor small changes III - unified diff

2005-08-14 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 15:01, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:03:25PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: i think it should be part of the syntax definition, which would be extended from highlighting only. This is not about highlighting, the highlighting is a side

Re: mc editor small changes III - unified diff

2005-08-14 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 03:27:45PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: So I don't see why we couldn't extend the current functionality (until you've finished the syntax highlighting rewrite ;)). :-P the highlighting hurts - not much, but it is still annoying. It's already there for the

Re: mc editor small changes III - unified diff

2005-08-13 Thread Jindrich Novy
Hello Frantisek, On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 09:07 +0200, František Řezníček wrote: here are the changes (just unified diff) : Please send the patch as an attachment for the next time, it makes extraction of it less painful. # Should I use the latest nighbuild and incorporate the changes there or

Re: mc editor small changes III - unified diff

2005-08-13 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Jindrich, On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 11:45, Jindrich Novy wrote: The question is whether highlighting of '' and '' is desirable in all cases. Highlighting where? Is this in any way related to the syntax highlighting? Highlighting of such characters doesn't make too much sense when editing C

Re: mc editor small changes III - unified diff

2005-08-13 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Jindrich, On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 11:45, Jindrich Novy wrote: The question is whether highlighting of '' and '' is desirable in all cases. Highlighting of such characters doesn't make too much sense when editing C source files for instance. I figured this patch is about the Go to matching

Re: mc editor small changes III - unified diff

2005-08-12 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello, On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hi František, On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 09:07, František Řezníček wrote: 4 files changed edit/edit.c, edit/editdraw.c, src/color.c, src/color.h. Changes were done on night build mc-2004-12-01-22.tar.gz. If you request to be redone on

Re: mc editor small changes III - unified diff

2005-08-12 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Pavel, On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 15:45, Pavel Tsekov wrote: The description of the patch can be found at the end of the email i.e. after the patch :) What exactly is edit_get_bracket used for? Doesn't seem to have anything to do with syntax highlighting. So my question is what this bracket