Adam Byrtek / alpha wrote:
Hi, I'm attaching MC patchfs update. Could you please review and test
this patch, and if everything is ok - apply it?
Regards
. . .
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/mc/vfs/ChangeLog,v
retrieving
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:12:59PM +0200, Andrew V. Samoilov wrote:
+2003-02-24 Adam Byrtek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+* extfs/patchfs.in: rm and proper copyin support, more
+functions to make code more clear
+
Good job! Applied, thanks.
I've sent this patch to Andrew privately for
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:21:21PM +0100, Adam Byrtek / alpha wrote:
I've sent this patch to Andrew privately for review, it is the feature
Arpi asked for. As is has been accepted I'm sending the patch to the
list - could you please test it?
Forgotten to attach the patch...
--
_.|._ |_
Hello!
I've noticed, that patchfs is quite useless right now.
I agree. That's why it's not associated with *.diff files by default.
I've updated it to handle unified diffs (the most popular patch format),
and I'm working on the context diff format.
I like the idea of using --- as the
OK an even better patchfs update :-)
It calls diffstat if present to display summary.
Also other cleanups.
Also attached patch to mc.ext so users
can browse patches by default.
Padraig.
#! /bin/sh
# Peter Daum[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan 1998, mc-4.1.22)
#
#Initial implementation
Hi I've attached a new
patchfs module which has the following changes:
1. Handles patches than were done on file(s) and not just directories
2. Only (and explicitly) handles unified format patches
3. Only creates the SUMMARY file when required (it was previously FILELIST)
comments appreciated.
