Re: 4.7pre4

2009-11-04 Thread Slava Zanko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Enrico Weigelt wrote: ACK. But we also should have the traditional one built-in as a compile-time option (for small systems). Small systems? In this case better way to use present libraries as possible for lesser size binary file and for less

redefining keys

2009-11-04 Thread y199mp1...@gmail.com
There are language issues in the section about redefining hotkeys in mc.hlp. Please find a suggested editing here below. The question marks in the last paragraph indicate that I did not understand the text. Further there is no indication in the help file that F1-F10 cannot be redefined, but I

Re: 4.7pre4

2009-11-04 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Slava Zanko slavaza...@gmail.com schrieb: Hi, Small systems? In this case better way to use present libraries as possible for lesser size binary file and for less memory usage per one process. Assuming they're present at all. For lots of my systems, mc is currently the *only* app

Re: 4.7pre4

2009-11-04 Thread Slava Zanko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Enrico Weigelt wrote: Small systems? In this case better way to use present libraries as possible for lesser size binary file and for less memory usage per one process. Assuming they're present at all. For lots of my systems, mc is

Re: redefining keys

2009-11-04 Thread Andrew Borodin
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:05:53 + y199mp1...@gmail.com wrote: Further there is no indication in the help file that F1-F10 cannot be redefined, but I failed consistently when trying. Is this intended, is it a feature and not a bug? It's known bug. I'm currently fixing it. -- Andrew