[bug #13101] Moving/copying single files to FTP VFS

2006-03-08 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Follow-up Comment #9, bug #13101 (project mc): I've just checked in a patch which improves ftpfs_dir_load(). It enables the attached patch to work no matter whether `ftpfs_first_cd_then_ls' is set or not. So if you checkout the source from cvs it should work.

[bug #13101] Moving/copying single files to FTP VFS

2006-03-08 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #13101 (project mc): If it is not clear you still should apply the patch attached to this bugreport since I haven't commited that yet. ___ Reply to this item at:

deb-support-without-dpkg.patch was Re: AMC patches ported to mc-2006-02-03-13.tar.gz

2006-03-08 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote: deb-support-without-dpkg.patch For systems withoput dpkg (almost any non-debian OS). It handles .deb files as regular .ar archives, as they are in reality. This would be nice addition. Only if we could avoid the 'O' option of gnu tar...

Re: deb-support-without-dpkg.patch was Re: AMC patches ported to mc-2006-02-03-13.tar.gz

2006-03-08 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote: On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote: deb-support-without-dpkg.patch For systems withoput dpkg (almost any non-debian OS). It handles .deb files as regular .ar archives, as they are in reality. This would be nice addition. Only if

Re: deb-support-without-dpkg.patch was Re: AMC patches ported to mc-2006-02-03-13.tar.gz

2006-03-08 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Pavel, On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 17:50 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: rw-r--r-- 250/250 50188 Nov 4 04:56 2005 C-ctype.o It is obvious that the list command of uar doesn't process the output properly and produces bad filenames. This is most probably caused by the fact that I removed the

Re: deb-support-without-dpkg.patch was Re: AMC patches ported to mc-2006-02-03-13.tar.gz

2006-03-08 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi, On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 17:35 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 17:50 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: rw-r--r-- 250/250 50188 Nov 4 04:56 2005 C-ctype.o Instead a new function vfs_parse_file_date_4() should be created that is called explicitly for dates that are