Hello, Adam!
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:01:25PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > i often accidentally do minor modifications (mostly partial escape
> > sequences) which i undo of course. anyway, afterwards i still don't know
> > if this was the only modification.
>
> Patch attached.
Problem
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:31:59PM +0200, Adam Byrtek / alpha wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:21:35PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > you mean, undo means "undo last editing action plus all following
> > movements"? NO WAY! i absolutely HATE this behaviour in vim. while
> > merging moves i
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:21:35PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> you mean, undo means "undo last editing action plus all following
> movements"? NO WAY! i absolutely HATE this behaviour in vim. while
> merging moves is negotiable, pretending that they don't exist is
And mcedit behaviour is pl
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 03:54:19PM +0200, Adam Byrtek / alpha wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:01:25PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > i often accidentally do minor modifications (mostly partial escape
> > sequences) which i undo of course. anyway, afterwards i still don't
> > know if this
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:01:25PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> i often accidentally do minor modifications (mostly partial escape
> sequences) which i undo of course. anyway, afterwards i still don't know
> if this was the only modification.
Patch attached.
BTW I'm not sure if it is wide t
i often accidentally do minor modifications (mostly partial escape
sequences) which i undo of course. anyway, afterwards i still don't know
if this was the only modification.
oh, fwiw, this gives me an idea: sometimes it would be useful to be able
to save the buffer to a temp file and run a diff a
