Re: [PATCH] Re: deb-support-without-dpkg.patch was Re: AMC patches ported to mc-2006-02-03-13.tar.gz

2006-03-10 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 10:45 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: The \? is GNU extension Is it? From the GNU sed info manual: `\?' As `*', but only matches zero or one. It is a GNU extension. ___

Re: [PATCH] Re: deb-support-without-dpkg.patch was Re: AMC patches ported to mc-2006-02-03-13.tar.gz

2006-03-09 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 17:50 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: 2005 control.tar.gz It appears ar is the app which uses 4 field dates that I was looking for ;-s . Please try the following patch against vfs/extfs/uar. It removes the fourth date field

Re: [PATCH] Re: deb-support-without-dpkg.patch was Re: AMC patches ported to mc-2006-02-03-13.tar.gz

2006-03-09 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Pavel, On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 10:45 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: thisyear=`date +%Y` I assumed the $(command) was portable. If not I need to restore the backticks in mc.wrapper.sh as well. The \? is GNU extension and I don't really understand why that construct is necessary (I am not a

Re: [PATCH] Re: deb-support-without-dpkg.patch was Re: AMC patches ported to mc-2006-02-03-13.tar.gz

2006-03-09 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Pavel, On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 10:45 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: The \? is GNU extension Is it? Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel

deb-support-without-dpkg.patch was Re: AMC patches ported to mc-2006-02-03-13.tar.gz

2006-03-08 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote: deb-support-without-dpkg.patch For systems withoput dpkg (almost any non-debian OS). It handles .deb files as regular .ar archives, as they are in reality. This would be nice addition. Only if we could avoid the 'O' option of gnu tar...

Re: deb-support-without-dpkg.patch was Re: AMC patches ported to mc-2006-02-03-13.tar.gz

2006-03-08 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote: On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote: deb-support-without-dpkg.patch For systems withoput dpkg (almost any non-debian OS). It handles .deb files as regular .ar archives, as they are in reality. This would be nice addition. Only if

Re: deb-support-without-dpkg.patch was Re: AMC patches ported to mc-2006-02-03-13.tar.gz

2006-03-08 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Pavel, On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 17:50 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: rw-r--r-- 250/250 50188 Nov 4 04:56 2005 C-ctype.o It is obvious that the list command of uar doesn't process the output properly and produces bad filenames. This is most probably caused by the fact that I removed the

Re: deb-support-without-dpkg.patch was Re: AMC patches ported to mc-2006-02-03-13.tar.gz

2006-03-08 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi, On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 17:35 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 17:50 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: rw-r--r-- 250/250 50188 Nov 4 04:56 2005 C-ctype.o Instead a new function vfs_parse_file_date_4() should be created that is called explicitly for dates that are