Re: mc and me

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > Sure, I can try to find time to help... Are you on IRC? Nope. I can join if I know there's something particular going on that I know about in advance and happen to be available at that time, but generally I prefer

Re: mc and me

On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 19:43 +0100, Egmont Koblinger wrote: > For minor changes, such as a followup bugfix in the viewer (e.g. 3531) > I wouldn't want to wait for more than a couple of days; let's say a > week at most. Does this sound okay? A week would be fine with me for minor changes, and I

Re: mc and me

Hi, My git knowledge is pretty accurately described by http://xkcd.com/1597/ , so the first time I'll do that branching and merging (esp. the latter) it'd be great if someone double checked on me. Also: What are the steps to be performed before/after a commit? I mean, run the unittests (make

Re: mc and me

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > Sure, I also prefer pull to push, but I find realtime to be much more > efficient when it comes to stuff like "can you hand-hold me while I'm > merging a branch for the first time". Sure, let's do so at one point.

Re: mc and me

On Sun, 2015-11-08 at 22:14 +0100, Egmont Koblinger wrote: > > My git knowledge is pretty accurately described by > http://xkcd.com/1597/ , so the first time I'll do that branching and > merging (esp. the latter) it'd be great if someone double checked on > me. Sure, I can try to find time to

Re: mc and me

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Yury, > I'm all for granting Egmont commit access. +1 from me. - -- *From:* Yury V. Zaytsev *To:* Egmont Koblinger, Slava Zanko, Andrew Borodin *Cc:* Mc Devel *Subject:* Re:

Re: mc and me

On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 11:12:55 +0300 Slava Zanko wrote: > > I'm all for granting Egmont commit access. > > +1 from me. Me too. -- Andrew ___ mc-devel mailing list https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel

Re: mc and me

Thanks to all of you guys! On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > How about doing it the other way around from now on? You put the branch > on review, and if there is no vote coming, and no one vehemently objects > on technically substantiated grounds, it can

Re: mc and me

On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 22:09 +0100, Egmont Koblinger wrote: > getting to know the development process, policies (e.g. which changes > require approval, when to git branch, etc.), and Well, basically it's all about having a ticket & a topic branch per feature / non-documentation bugfix, where

mc and me

Hi guys, I've been thinking about writing something like this for quite a long time... Some of you might know that I like contributing to various open source projects as a hobby. Some of you might know what my top hobby project is. mc is the second in the line. Recently I've devoted a much

Re: mc and me

On 11/4/15, Egmont Koblinger wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've been thinking about writing something like this for quite a long > time... Egmont, I feel for you! (I hope these are suitable words. I'm not an English speaker. At this moment I'm hungry and tired so I'm giving up