Dear All,
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote:
BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
I don't think so, and I don't think it is worth it. Maintaining two backends
IMHO just causes headaches
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
Anyway, there are plenty of apps (e.g. vim, joe) that perfectly support
UTF-8 and use ncurses (not the w version). I wonder how it is possible...
Because they only use the terminfo (low-level) parts of ncurses, see man
3ncurses terminfo. Those
Hi,
BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
I don't think so, and I don't think it is worth it. Maintaining two backends
IMHO just causes headaches while it doesn't make mc better. I still can't
see why developers do not decide which one to use and drop the
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
I don't think so, and I don't think it is worth it. Maintaining two backends
IMHO just causes headaches while it doesn't make mc better. I still can't
see why
On Monday 12 June 2006 10:55, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Please take notice. It would probably be good if Vladimir and you could
keep your UTF-8 patch sets in sync. It just seems wasted effort to do
this in two places independently. Some inter-distro communication is not
going to hurt. Maybe
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote:
BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
I don't think so, and I don't think it is worth it. Maintaining two backends
IMHO just causes headaches while it
Hello!
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:45 +1200, Bart Oldeman wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote:
BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
I don't think so, and I don't think it is worth
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 09:45:26AM +1200, Bart Oldeman wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote:
BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
I don't think so, and I don't think it is worth it.
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
I don't think so, and I don't think it is worth it. Maintaining two backends
IMHO just causes headaches while it
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:45 +1200, Bart Oldeman wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote:
BTW: anyone is working on UFT-8 support for ncurses(w) backend ?
I don't
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:08:46PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Egmonts patches are worth looking at. I've blatantly ignored pushing
them to you as I'd expected you to integrate them over time. I've
probably not made it clear enough to you before that these patches are
worth
Hi Leonard,
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 13:08 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 20:13 +0200, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
I've just upgraded to slang-2 in our distro and also updated the UTF-8
patches to mc-4.6.1 (based on SUSE's version). It was easier than I thought
it
Hello Jindrich,
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 20:13 +0200, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
I've just upgraded to slang-2 in our distro and also updated the UTF-8
patches to mc-4.6.1 (based on SUSE's version). It was easier than I thought
it would be. I was glad to see that you had applied plenty of my patches
In non-UTF-8 mode slang2 behaves a bit different than the patched slang1.
As a result, mc does work with 8bit encodings, like 8859-2 or KOI8.
The attached patch fixes the SLsmg_write_nwchars() function to be fully
compatible with the slang1 version and uses it consistently instead of
Hi Vladimir (and others),
I've just upgraded to slang-2 in our distro and also updated the UTF-8
patches to mc-4.6.1 (based on SUSE's version). It was easier than I thought
it would be. I was glad to see that you had applied plenty of my patches in
SUSE (those named 00-*). Please take a look at
On Saturday 12 November 2005 20:59, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hi Bart, list,
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 08:14 +1200, Bart Oldeman wrote:
Basically you'd need to apply Fedora's patch, and then (sorry no proper
patch here but it's not a big deal)
Attached you'll find a proper patch. I've
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 12:18 +0200, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote:
On Saturday 12 November 2005 20:59, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hi Bart, list,
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 08:14 +1200, Bart Oldeman wrote:
Basically you'd need to apply Fedora's patch, and then (sorry no proper
patch here
Hi Bart, list,
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 08:14 +1200, Bart Oldeman wrote:
Basically you'd need to apply Fedora's patch, and then (sorry no proper
patch here but it's not a big deal)
Attached you'll find a proper patch. I've moved the hunk from global.h
to myslang.h (and dropped the inclusion of
Hi,
config.h @ 3
+#ifdef __APPLE__
+#define unix 1
+#endif
I guess developers prefer patches created with diff -u rather than just
some pseudo-code. Exctact the original source code to a directory called
mc-4.6.1.orig (or actually you can call it whatever you want), copy it to
mc-4.6.1 (or
Hi,
I have patches for the NFC / NFD issue and two other patches for the
Darwin/Mac Platform for the current UTF-8 version, with all patches
applied (I don't know where to post it, so I post here, sorry):
config.h @ 3
+#ifdef __APPLE__
+#define unix 1
+#endif
I guess developers prefer
Hi,
1) thank you for your answer, I'll post a diff if everything will work
as expected :)
2) the multi-byte char Slang2 bug came up at Debian too, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=316010 . I applied
this patch (080_wide_chars.patch), but still counts badly.
Still no Asian
Hi,
I have patches for the NFC / NFD issue and two other patches for the
Darwin/Mac Platform for the current UTF-8 version, with all patches
applied (I don't know where to post it, so I post here, sorry):
config.h @ 3
+#ifdef __APPLE__
+#define unix 1
+#endif
config.h @ 53
+#include wchar.h
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:11:28PM +0200, Bálint Kardos wrote:
But even with all patches and stuff, I see the following Unicode glitches:
- the utf-8 chars are not diplayed in the dir list (on Ubuntu, everything is
OK)
for ÉÁŰŐÚÖÜÓ I see EAUOUOUO (upper, lowercase all wrong)
- the
Hi, I've debuged it from the beginning, and:
screen.c 762:
// inserted
wchar_t lonaka[100];
memcpy(lonaka,buffer,txtlen*sizeof(wchar_t));
lonaka[txtlen]=0;
// end inserted
printw (%*s, still, );
Hello,
Maybe this discussion should be moved to general list - mc at gnome dot
org.
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Bálint Kardos wrote:
Hi, I've debuged it from the beginning, and:
screen.c 762:
// inserted
wchar_t lonaka[100];
Hmm, sorry for splitting my email to two parts, but Gmail has keyboard shortcuts too...
***
So I've Ubuntu too, I aliened the FC4 mc rpm version to it, but:
- it said, it needs glibc 2.3.5 for Utf-8 operations
- and requires the slang2 library, which was unavaliable.
anyway I patched up
Hi Folks,
sorry for bothering, I'm just a newbie, who tries to have UTF-8 MC on his OS X.
I've downloaded the latest source, compiled, it was errorous.
I have Fedora, and their MC far more better, but I just can not reproduce it on my Mac.
I've downloaded from the CVS all FC4 patches and applied
On Monday 19 of September 2005 22:14, Bart Oldeman wrote:
Does anyone know mc utf8 patch that uses slang-2 ?
No, but it's not too hard too change the existing patch.
Basically you'd need to apply Fedora's patch, and then (sorry no proper
patch here but it's not a big deal)
Thanks, works.
hi,
Arkadiusz was kind enough to provide me the sourcecode, and I managed
to compile it on my Mac (Darwin 8.2.0).
But even with all patches and stuff, I see the following Unicode glitches:
- the utf-8 chars are not diplayed in the dir list (on Ubuntu, everything is OK)
for ÉÁŰŐÚÖÜÓ I see
Hi,
There are few patches adding UTF-8 support to mc available but they require
modified slang1 library. There is already stable slang-2 version with native
UTF-8 support.
Does anyone know mc utf8 patch that uses slang-2 ?
--
Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team
30 matches
Mail list logo
