Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.19-rc1

2017-02-24 Thread David Haller
Hello,

On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
>TLDR; I would appreciate if you could please test the following tarball
>on your systems and report any blocker regressions as compared to the
>previous 4.8.18 release:
[..]

Looks fine here for openSUSE and I'll be using it from now on and
report regressions.

-dnh

-- 
Sorry, I don't know how to help in this situation.
Maybe you should try asking a human?   -- a TeX message
___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel


Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.19-rc1

2017-02-24 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
Hi there,

TLDR; I would appreciate if you could please test the following tarball
on your systems and report any blocker regressions as compared to the
previous 4.8.18 release:

http://www.midnight-commander.org/nopaste/tarball/mc-4.8.18-250-g60faabd.tar.xz

$ sha256sum mc-4.8.18-250-g60faabd.tar.xz
e88ac5a087a71ea5c63ccb44bc10eac706ebac5a19f950b1b06f1fb7adaad3c6  
mc-4.8.18-250-g60faabd.tar.xz

I've built this tarball out of the latest master with translations from
Transifex pulled in on a fresh Fedora 25 VM where I'm also going to
build the final release (previous release was built on Fedora 23).

I'd particularly appreciate feedback regarding builds on platforms that
we aren't regularly using ourselves (non-Linux), like FreeBSD, Solaris,
etc. If no serious regressions are going to be uncovered, we'll probably
release 4.8.19 in the week to come...

Many thanks!

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel