Re: portability of mc

2005-06-01 Thread Oskar Liljeblad
On Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at 07:36, Roland Illig wrote: Do we want mc to be able to run on platforms that have: - 16 bit ints - 16 bit size_t - other weird system limits? This would affect all arithmetic operations that could lead to numbers bigger than 32k in magnitude. What's the

Re: portability of mc

2005-05-21 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:41:02AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:09 +0200, Roland Illig wrote: Pavel Roskin wrote: No. In particular, I don't think we need to support Win64, where long cannot hold a pointer. Why not? What's wrong about that? Because it's a

Re: portability of mc

2005-05-21 Thread Roland Illig
Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:41:02AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:09 +0200, Roland Illig wrote: Pavel Roskin wrote: No. In particular, I don't think we need to support Win64, where long cannot hold a pointer. Why not? What's wrong about

Re: portability of mc

2005-05-21 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:11:35PM +0200, Roland Illig wrote: And even size_t has nothing to do with the representation of pointers. i don't think we're speaking about such stupid things as casting between pointers and non-pointers (for other purposes than abusing a void* as a variant type

Re: portability of mc

2005-05-20 Thread Roland Illig
Pavel Roskin wrote: On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 07:13 +0200, Roland Illig wrote: - other weird system limits? No. In particular, I don't think we need to support Win64, where long cannot hold a pointer. Why not? What's wrong about that? Roland ___ Mc-devel

Re: portability of mc

2005-05-19 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hi, Roland! On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 07:13 +0200, Roland Illig wrote: Do we want mc to be able to run on platforms that have: - 16 bit ints - 16 bit size_t No. - other weird system limits? No. In particular, I don't think we need to support Win64, where long cannot hold a pointer. --

portability of mc

2005-05-17 Thread Roland Illig
Do we want mc to be able to run on platforms that have: - 16 bit ints - 16 bit size_t - other weird system limits? This would affect all arithmetic operations that could lead to numbers bigger than 32k in magnitude. Roland ___ Mc-devel mailing list

Re: portability of mc

2005-05-17 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:13:36AM +0200, Roland Illig wrote: Do we want mc to be able to run on platforms that have: - 16 bit ints - 16 bit size_t hardly any unix app will run or even compile under these conditions. we're not in the 70s any more. :) -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me