Re: Image Protection

2000-03-30 Thread Heidi Wilson

Good Morning,

In response to the image protection issue. I am in the process of trying to 
put together a virtual artifact database which, of course, involves images. 
This question of image protection has plaqued us from the onset. What we 
have decided to go with is a lower resolution thumbnail, plus the infamous 
copyright statement (does this really make people feel guilty!?). I was just 
wondering, of you who have already placed images on the web, what resolution 
have you been using? What is a good enough to show the image, but bad enough 
that the user may not want to use it?


It's good to know that I'm not the only one struggling with this problem.

Heidi Wilson
Cultural Resource Services
Parks Canada
Calgary


From: Trudy Levy tr...@dig-mar.com
Reply-To: mc...@listserv.mcn.edu
To: mc...@listserv.mcn.edu
Subject: Re: Image Protection
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 22:24:31 -0800

Even stranger I just joined this list after Amalyah Keshet of MCN read my
article on Image Security at Dig-mar.com.  and contacted me.

Most people are using the rule of small thumbnails, low res, not good for
anyone.  Throw in the copyright to remind people they are stealing.  I 
would be

interested to know how many are watermarking. I have found one stock Photo
House which does. There is an alternative to watermarking and that is
encrypting.   Some interesting software solutions which protect your images 
by

encoding them are Alchemedia' s Clever Content  and Xerox's ContentGuard .
ContentGuard actually does watermarking, licensing and dusting *,-).

 Dear MCNers,

 (Weird - two messages to the list from Alberta in one day!)

 The University of Alberta's Art Collection is currently developing a web
 interface to its database. The majority of database records have digital
 images attached to them, which has raised the issue of image security.

 We would be very interested in hearing what other institutions have done 
in
 the way of protecting their digital images on the web. Are any 
collections

 watermarking their images? And if not, why not? Has there been any
 repercussion in not doing so? Or is marking images with copyright
 information the preferred methodology?

 Thanks in advance for any insights the members of this list might be 
able to

 shed on this matter.

 
 jim whittome
 museums and collections services
 university of alberta
 edmonton, alberta, canada
 jim.whitt...@ualberta.ca
 

-- Trudy Levy
   Image Integration
   The Digital Imaging Guide
7 Third Ave. SF, CA 94118 415/750 1274
 Images are information - manage them
 www.DIG-mar.com





__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com





Re: Image Protection

2000-03-30 Thread J. Trant

There is a good paper on this issue on the Museums and the Web 2000 program;

I've taken the liberty of posting the abstract and URL below.

jennifer


Protecting a museum's digital stock through watermarks

Torsten Bissel, Manfred Bogen, Claus Riemann, GMD - German National 
Research Center for Information Technology, Germany


Full text at: http://www.archimuse.com/mw2000/papers/bissel/bissel.html

Abstract: Basically, museums have only limited possibilities to 
ensure their existence and to secure their funding: by sponsors, by 
donations, by visitors, and by selling copies of their collection in 
form of copyrights. While the first two (external) are almost 
completely out of their control, they have major influence on the 
visitors' acceptance by keeping their collection together, by 
enlarging it, and by making it attractive (internal funding). This is 
well understood since years. By granting copyrights to other parties 
and by publishing parts of their collection in the Web, museums touch 
the essence of their stock and they have to
enter a new technology realm at the same time. Granting copyrights 
based on secure technology will become more and more crucial in the 
near future as unallowed duplication will be facilitated which will 
harm the museums' funding essentially.


This paper is not about intellectual property rights in general, 
copyright policies, or about copyright laws. We will talk about 
copyright technology based on watermarking. Ideally, all scans should 
have an integrated header information and information including 
author/ creator of the object, title, date, owner, copyright owner, 
and some usage patterns (sale or license agreements). This 
information has to be protected against manipulation and destruction.


Our paper starts with a description of the different approaches for 
embedding a visible or non-visible digital watermark into multimedia 
objects with focus on pictures. The feasibility of the different 
approaches in respect to the needs of a common museum is evaluated. 
After that a detailed description of various 'attacks' follows and 
the 'robustness' of the various kinds of digital watermarks against 
the forgery efforts are compared. An evaluation on currently 
available systems on the market and on related research projects is 
done next.


The ability to embed robust watermarks in digital images does not 
necessarily imply the ability to establish ownership. Nevertheless it 
is crucial for fingerprinting. Robust watermarks must be combined 
with hash functions and time stamping mechanisms and be embedded in a 
framework of trusted third parties for registration. In this third 
part we analyse the different demands of a copyright protection 
infrastructure, identify needed components and their 
interrelationship, and describe a system that fits a museum's needs.


__
J. Trantjtr...@archimuse.com
Partner  Principal Consultant  phone: +1 412 422 8530
Archives  Museum Informatics   fax: +1 412 422 8594
2008 Murray Ave, Suite Dhttp://www.archimuse.com
Pittsburgh, PA 15217
__