[MCN-L] IP SIG: Creative Commons: letter from Renata Avila, CC Guatemala project lead

2008-11-08 Thread Amalyah Keshet
 Original Message 
Subject:[cc-commonerletter] Commoner Letter #2 - Renata Avila, CC 
Guatemala project lead
Date:   Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:47:21 -0800
From:   Melissa Reeder meli...@creativecommons.org







To our community - we are honored and proud to present the second
letter in this year's Commoner Letter series, written by CC Guatemala
Project Lead, Renata Avila. In addition to her passionate work heading
off the successful launch last month of Creative Commons licenses in
Guatemala, Renata is also a human rights lawyer and a frequent author
for Global Voices Online,  an international citizen journalism
project. As you will see in  this letter, some of CC's most inspiring
stories come from our international community; they help remind us why
CC and the Commons are vital and how they have the power to effect
positive change in ways that may never have seemed possible.

==

Dear Commoner,

The Creative Commons enables us to connect with people from other
cultures, share ideas, and solve problems together. It is a tool that
gives voice to creativity, and allows us to share symbolic space
within society, charting alternative routes to inclusion across the
continents, in all languages.

My country, Guatemala, is an amazing place where indigenous
communities and Spanish speakers share a diverse cultural space. The
diversity extends from the culture to the landscapes, right down to
the way we communicate. There are 22 indigenous languages in active
use by Guatemalan communities across mountains, two oceans, and 33
volcanoes. Sadly, our country was affected profoundly by more than 30
years of civil strife until the mid-90s, and is only now emerging from
a long period of violence and racism, exclusion and social disparity.

Poverty in Guatemala is high and deep, and the country has remarkably
unequal distributions of income, resources and opportunities. In my
work as a human rights lawyer, I have experienced in a very personal
way that the potential of our cultural commons and national heritage
is disconnected and unrealized.

Each of our indigenous communities treasures a legacy of scientific
and technical knowledge, artistic and aesthetic values of their own,
but they need the tools to open their culture to others and share both
ways. We need to find ways to overcome linguistic, technical and
social barriers, and build connections with Spanish-speakers
completely disconnected from their reality. To create a common culture
is a challenge and a necessity to improve living conditions and assure
peace. As in many other developing countries, basic necessities such
as food, potable water and medical care certainly have priority. But
how can we communicate to the world that we are in fact a rich
country, in the sense of how we create and preserve culture? How do we
connect different visions of the world within the same country?

I decided to spearhead the launch of Creative Commons Licenses in
Guatemala as a tool to help connect our cultural commons. Now the
Guatemalan Ministry of Education is using cc for a Schools of the
Future project with books and materials with Creative Commons licenses
to help breach the digital divide. One of the most prestigious
universities in the country, Franscisco Marroqu?n University, have
released their online educational resources to the Commons too.

Internationalization and localization of the Creative Commons licenses
is more than just a technical, legal process. It enables creative,
verbal and nonverbal forms of expression as a vehicle to share and
learn from one another. Through human connections we can discover
treasures that reshape our understanding of concepts like
development, wealth and others. We can begin to cross the mental
and geographic borders that divide us.

As an author for Global Voices Online, one of the most successful
examples of global cultural exchange using Creative Commons licenses;
and as a lawyer dealing with the complexities of multilingual,
developing countries in transition to peace, I believe that open tools
such as the Creative Commons are essential for creating better
societies. We have a lot to learn from each other. With this letter I
challenge you to allow yourself to be embraced by another world.

Please support the creation of our Global Commons.

===

We rely on our supporters to continue our work enabling
stories like those listed above. Check it out --

Donate:
http://support.creativecommons.org/join

CC Store:
http://support.creativecommons.org/store

Events:
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Events

ccNewsletter:
http://creativecommons.org/about/newsletter

Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the
generous support of organizations including the Center for the
Public Domain, the Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation,
The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of
the public.



[MCN-L] HD video in the galleries?

2008-11-08 Thread Dana Hutchins
Have you looked into the MedeaWiz DV76 HD Player? Sounds like it does what
you need and it's $385.

http://www.medeawiz.com/products/Dv76.htm

Sold through Team Kingsley in St. Louis.

http://www.teamkingsley.com/MedeaWiz.htm

Please let me know if this does what you're looking for or if anyone else
has experience with this product. I'm about to use their DV68 for the first
time for a project now. I'm curious about the HD player.

Thanks



Dana Hutchins
XhibitNet
541 Congress St.
Portland, ME 04101
207.773.1101 ext.102
dana at xhibit.net
www.xhibit.net



On 11/7/08 5:51 PM, Jason Bondy jbondy at okhistory.org wrote:

 Daniel,
 
 Thanks for your response.  We have an 80GB hard drive in the computer.  Many
 of the video clips are 5-10 minutes long, except one that is 32 minutes.  We
 are planning more long documentary type films, so we need to be ready for
 the larger files.
 
 We currently own a few of the Firefly digital video players for
 standard-definition video, but their HD players are out of our budget at
 this time, as are the Adtec devices.  Also, we already have the computers
 installed, so we were going to try to use those if we can.  As far as
 Blu-ray, we are concerned about wear and tear on it if the film is repeating
 continuously for nine hours per day.  A hard drive is much cheaper to
 replace when it wears out.
 
 We are still learning about various HD formats and playback options.  We
 were using H.264 originally because we have a Flash program that plays the
 files using QuickTime.  We need a playback format and application that goes
 straight to full screen as soon as the computer boots up. Do you know of any
 good reference material that explains some of the formats more in depth?
 
 Thank you.  I really appreciate your time and assistance!
 
 Jason
 
 ___
 Jason Bondy
 Exhibit AV/IT Systems
 Oklahoma History Center
 2401 N. Laird Ave.
 Oklahoma City, OK  73105
 405-522-0783 - Office
 405-522-5402 - Fax
 www.okhistory.org
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu [mailto:mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu] On Behalf Of
 Daniel M. Bartolini
 Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 4:02 PM
 To: Museum Computer Network Listserv
 Subject: Re: [MCN-L] HD video in the galleries?
 
 Hi Jason-
 
 How much hard drive space do you have available on these machines and
 how long are your videos? I ask because HD playback on computers is
 significantly improved when you use codecs that create discrete frames
 versus heavily compressed MPEG formats like H.264. For example running
 your video out to something like DVCPro HD or the Animation preset
 creates all independent frames of the movie. Your hard drive overhead is
 enormous (possibly 2 Gb for every 3 minutes, depending on bit rate) but
 the computer has to think far less about the process as there are no
 i-frames going on.
 
 Alternatively, if you need really small file sizes, mess with the H.264
 bit rate. Start high at 1500kb/s and move down to around 900 or less
 until you find something that allows you to maintain your full frame
 rate. The lower you go of course the more you will see those motion
 artifacts, but perhaps not jumpiness.
 
 The dirty sort-of-secret of that format is it's really processor
 intensive and upgrading video cards won't matter a lot unless you
 specifically buy something like the latest NVidia cards that have built
 in hardware rendering support of H.264 and other MPEG codecs, or if
 you're willing to use a program like Max/Jitter (or comparable VJ
 system), or environment like openFrameworks to display your video in
 OpenGL so all work is done on the video card.
 
 Finally, have you considered standalone HD players, like those from
 Adtec, or going to Blu-Ray (I know, more money, may not work)?
 
 Oi. That was long. Sorry. Hope that helps.
 
 Have a good weekend.
 
 Daniel
 
 
 
 
 Jason Bondy wrote:
 Hello all,
 
  
 
 We have recently begun moving toward High-Definition video for all of our
 interviews, documentaries and other footage to be used in exhibits.  We
 are
 using internally produced video as well as video shot by outside
 producers.
 However, we are running into some obstacles determining the best solution
 for playback in the galleries.  We will be playing the HD video files from
 Windows-based computers connected to plasma monitors.  Currently we are
 trying it with H.264 encoded QuickTime files, but they are very jumpy on
 video clips with a lot of motion.  We have upgraded the RAM and video
 cards
 in the computers, but with very little improvement.  Also, we using Cat5
 DVI/HDMI extenders as there is quite a bit of distance from the computer
 to
 the monitor.
 
  
 
 Who else out there is using HD video in your exhibits?  How are you doing
 it?  We would welcome any suggestions or input you may have.
 
  
 
 Thank you so much,
 
  
 
 Jason
 
  
 
  
 
 ___
 
 Jason Bondy
 
 Exhibit 

[MCN-L] HD video in the galleries?

2008-11-08 Thread Jason Bondy
Dana,

I hadn't seen that one before.  We had originally ruled out dedicated
players as the ones that we had found were more than we wanted to spend on
it.  This one may be worth looking into though.

Thanks,

Jason

___
Jason Bondy
Exhibit AV/IT Systems
Oklahoma History Center
2401 N. Laird Ave.
Oklahoma City, OK  73105
405-522-0783 - Office
405-522-5402 - Fax
www.okhistory.org
 

-Original Message-
From: mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu [mailto:mcn-l-boun...@mcn.edu] On Behalf Of Dana
Hutchins
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 8:09 AM
To: Museum Computer Network Listserv
Subject: Re: [MCN-L] HD video in the galleries?

Have you looked into the MedeaWiz DV76 HD Player? Sounds like it does what
you need and it's $385.

http://www.medeawiz.com/products/Dv76.htm

Sold through Team Kingsley in St. Louis.

http://www.teamkingsley.com/MedeaWiz.htm

Please let me know if this does what you're looking for or if anyone else
has experience with this product. I'm about to use their DV68 for the first
time for a project now. I'm curious about the HD player.

Thanks



Dana Hutchins
XhibitNet
541 Congress St.
Portland, ME 04101
207.773.1101 ext.102
dana at xhibit.net
www.xhibit.net



On 11/7/08 5:51 PM, Jason Bondy jbondy at okhistory.org wrote:

 Daniel,
 
 Thanks for your response.  We have an 80GB hard drive in the computer.
Many
 of the video clips are 5-10 minutes long, except one that is 32 minutes.
We
 are planning more long documentary type films, so we need to be ready for
 the larger files.
 
 We currently own a few of the Firefly digital video players for
 standard-definition video, but their HD players are out of our budget at
 this time, as are the Adtec devices.  Also, we already have the computers
 installed, so we were going to try to use those if we can.  As far as
 Blu-ray, we are concerned about wear and tear on it if the film is
repeating
 continuously for nine hours per day.  A hard drive is much cheaper to
 replace when it wears out.
 
 We are still learning about various HD formats and playback options.  We
 were using H.264 originally because we have a Flash program that plays the
 files using QuickTime.  We need a playback format and application that
goes
 straight to full screen as soon as the computer boots up. Do you know of
any
 good reference material that explains some of the formats more in depth?
 
 Thank you.  I really appreciate your time and assistance!
 
 Jason
 
 ___
 Jason Bondy
 Exhibit AV/IT Systems
 Oklahoma History Center
 2401 N. Laird Ave.
 Oklahoma City, OK  73105
 405-522-0783 - Office
 405-522-5402 - Fax
 www.okhistory.org
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu [mailto:mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu] On Behalf Of
 Daniel M. Bartolini
 Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 4:02 PM
 To: Museum Computer Network Listserv
 Subject: Re: [MCN-L] HD video in the galleries?
 
 Hi Jason-
 
 How much hard drive space do you have available on these machines and
 how long are your videos? I ask because HD playback on computers is
 significantly improved when you use codecs that create discrete frames
 versus heavily compressed MPEG formats like H.264. For example running
 your video out to something like DVCPro HD or the Animation preset
 creates all independent frames of the movie. Your hard drive overhead is
 enormous (possibly 2 Gb for every 3 minutes, depending on bit rate) but
 the computer has to think far less about the process as there are no
 i-frames going on.
 
 Alternatively, if you need really small file sizes, mess with the H.264
 bit rate. Start high at 1500kb/s and move down to around 900 or less
 until you find something that allows you to maintain your full frame
 rate. The lower you go of course the more you will see those motion
 artifacts, but perhaps not jumpiness.
 
 The dirty sort-of-secret of that format is it's really processor
 intensive and upgrading video cards won't matter a lot unless you
 specifically buy something like the latest NVidia cards that have built
 in hardware rendering support of H.264 and other MPEG codecs, or if
 you're willing to use a program like Max/Jitter (or comparable VJ
 system), or environment like openFrameworks to display your video in
 OpenGL so all work is done on the video card.
 
 Finally, have you considered standalone HD players, like those from
 Adtec, or going to Blu-Ray (I know, more money, may not work)?
 
 Oi. That was long. Sorry. Hope that helps.
 
 Have a good weekend.
 
 Daniel
 
 
 
 
 Jason Bondy wrote:
 Hello all,
 
  
 
 We have recently begun moving toward High-Definition video for all of our
 interviews, documentaries and other footage to be used in exhibits.  We
 are
 using internally produced video as well as video shot by outside
 producers.
 However, we are running into some obstacles determining the best solution
 for playback in the galleries.  We will be playing the HD video files