We treat objects where we've confirmed the copyright status and rights
statement (i.e. acquired a license) differently from those where we're assuming
that the works may be protected by copyright and we'll eventually be tracking
down the artist.
The first has a detailed copyright statement:
As the App market continues to increase and garner the attention of our
community, it might be worthwhile to note that the iPhone is not the only
platform on the market, and that they are starting to loose their market share
to the Android OS.
http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/googles-android-j
> Amalyah Keshet
>
> I agree entirely with Peter, who has answered this question far more
elegantly than I could.
>
> We never think twice about using the phrase "(c) the artist" as a default,
if that's the only
> information or best guess we have, or if the artist or copyright owner
doesn't answ
We realize that not everyone can make it to L.A. for this year?s annual
meeting. That?s why AAM is holding the first-ever Virtual Conference, May
24?25. One registration (AAM members: $199; non-members: $299) gets you 10
access keys.
Check it out: http://aam-us.org/am10/virtualconference2010.cfm.
I agree. I have heard the term "agent" used within another schema, I
believe, VRC or Dublin core elements. However, I really would concur
with the use of the term "(c) the artist" for a museum!
Jeff Barbour
School Librarian
Centura College - VA Beach Campus
2697 Dean Drive
VA Beach, VA 23452
I agree entirely with Peter, who has answered this question far more elegantly
than I could.
We never think twice about using the phrase "(c) the artist" as a default, if
that's the only
information or best guess we have, or if the artist or copyright owner doesn't
answer our enquiries.
Am
Apologies for cross posting.
National Digital Forum 2010 Conference
Linking data, linking people
Monday 18 - Tuesday 19 October 2010
Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington
The 9th annual National Digital Forum conference will be held in
Wellington on Monday 18 - Tuesday 19 October 2
Hi everyone:
I'm part of an all-day copyright workshop at AAM in a couple of weeks,
and we'll be discussing, among other things, fair use and thumbnails on
museum websites. In addition, I'll be moderating a breakout session
about social media and copyright. With that in mind, I have a few
questio
Since orphan works legislation has not passed, classifying a work as an orphan
work has no legal significance: it is purely an internal administrative matter.
And consequently, there is no requirement about how to label things - it is up
to you. (Of course, since March, 1989 there has been no