Re: [MCN-L] VR Vendors

intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received > this message in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution, use > or copying of this message and any attachments hereto is strictly prohibited. > If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender > immediately. > > -- > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 09:35:15 -0600 > From: Sarah Wambold <swamb...@gmail.com> > To: Museum Computer Network Listserv <mcn-l@mcn.edu> > Subject: Re: [MCN-L] VR vendors? > Message-ID: >

Re: [MCN-L] VR vendors?

Hi Shyam, I don't know how extensive you want your VR experience to be, but I highly recommend xRez Studio http://www.xrez.com/ I know they've done a project with the Smithsonian, and with several cultural heritage sites. I'm very impressed with their work. Best, Linda

Re: [MCN-L] VR vendors?

We partner with GURU here in Balboa Park on a number of projects - a wayfinding park-wide app with some points-of-interest AR experiences overlaying historic photos of key buildings and gardens, and the San Diego Museum of Art’s App with a couple of awesome AR experiences - the "Open Jaw of

Re: [MCN-L] VR vendors?

I will give a plus 1 for GuidiGO and Google Tango. We have had a great experience with them and are releasing another phase of our project with them later this year. The visitor feedback from the tour that we are offering has been outstanding. Richard Scott rsc...@dia.org Detroit Institute of

Re: [MCN-L] VR vendors?

GURU http://theguru.co/ is an interesting one. We're not ready for VR or AR yet here but I like to keep up with the possibilities, I met the Guru people at a conference and like them. Another one which I think has s lot of potential is Histovery http://www.histovery.com/en/ who have done AR

Re: [MCN-L] VR vendors?

Hi Shyam, We're launching an AR project this fall, partnering with Google (using Tango platform) and GuidiGO. Happy to chat about it if you're interested: swamb...@clyffordstillmuseum.org. Cheers! Sarah On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Shyam Oberoi wrote: > We're exploring a