RE: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually worked?

2016-12-01 Thread Miller, Todd 
I am sure there is a good reason it was changed from Automatic to 
Automatic(delayed)

I know in SCCM 2012, there was a good chance the SMS service would be fail to 
start on at reboot – pretty frequently.  When we rebooted large numbers of 
computers for patches, there would be a detectable number -- 5%(ish) where the 
sms service failed to start. Another reboot would usually solve the problem and 
once the service was running – it stayed running.
 The fix at that time for the problem was to set the service to 
automatic(delayed)…  I always assumed that MS set the service to Automatic 
(delayed) for this reason – that Automatic (not delayed) was unreliable at 
boot.  I will check in with you at MMS for “the rest of the story”

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 10:55 AM
To: mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually 
worked?

Not that I would do it en masse, but we’ve been told that it is supported to 
change the startup to a regular automatic instead of delayed start.

There’s an interesting backstory to why it is delayed start involving Mr. Gates 
I’ll tell you at MMS (if you’re there and interested).

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Joe Krilov
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 9:20 AM
To: mdtosd@lists.myITforum.com<mailto:mdtosd@lists.myITforum.com>
Subject: Re: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually 
worked?

"Also since SCCM service is delayed start, it takes a long time for the 
remote session to become available after a reboot.  That really hamstrings 
certain support workflows."
Would simply changing the startup to Automatic for the Configuration Manager 
Remote Control service using Group Policy fix this?

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Miller, Todd 
<todd-mil...@uiowa.edu<mailto:todd-mil...@uiowa.edu>> wrote:
Better support for multiple monitors would be a nice addition.  Frankly, I am 
just glad to have the tool back after it was abandoned (almost) entirely in 
SCCM 2007.The support staff’s biggest complaint is lack of useable support 
for multiple monitors.  Also since SCCM service is delayed start, it takes a 
long time for the remote session to become available after a reboot.  That 
really hamstrings certain support workflows.


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] 
On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 8:22 AM
To: 'mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com>' 
<mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com>>
Subject: RE: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually 
worked?

The main thing I want them to add is support for remote machines. You could ask 
for Mac support too assuming you are managing your Mac’s with SCCM.

And yes Niall, it should be user voice I screwed up.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Isaac Holmes
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:43 PM
To: mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com>
Cc: ms...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ms...@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: Re: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually 
worked?

[External Email]

I would love to use it, but we would still have to buy another product to be 
able to remotely support and assist on Mac machines.

Isaac Holmes
IT Engineering Specialist

University of Notre Dame
320 IT Center
Notre Dame, IN 46556

(574) 631-3254<tel:(574)%20631-3254>

On Nov 29, 2016 8:08 PM, "Niall Brady" 
<any...@gmail.com<mailto:any...@gmail.com>> wrote:
shouldn't this be a uservoice instead john ?

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Marcum, John 
<jmar...@bradley.com<mailto:jmar...@bradley.com>> wrote:
How many of you would like to use ConfigMgr remote control however it’s limited 
functionality prevents you from doing so? Worse still is that you are likely 
paying for some other remote control solution because remote control in 
ConfigMgr just doesn’t meet your needs. If you agree and you’d like to see 
improvements made in the current remote control offering in ConfigMgr please 
vote up my item on connect.

https://connect.microsoft.com/ConfigurationManagervnext/feedbackdetail/view/3113536/make-configmgr-remote-control-more-useful







Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail

RE: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually worked?

2016-12-01 Thread Jason Sandys 
Not that I would do it en masse, but we’ve been told that it is supported to 
change the startup to a regular automatic instead of delayed start.

There’s an interesting backstory to why it is delayed start involving Mr. Gates 
I’ll tell you at MMS (if you’re there and interested).

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Joe Krilov
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 9:20 AM
To: mdtosd@lists.myITforum.com
Subject: Re: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually 
worked?

"Also since SCCM service is delayed start, it takes a long time for the 
remote session to become available after a reboot.  That really hamstrings 
certain support workflows."
Would simply changing the startup to Automatic for the Configuration Manager 
Remote Control service using Group Policy fix this?

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Miller, Todd 
<todd-mil...@uiowa.edu<mailto:todd-mil...@uiowa.edu>> wrote:
Better support for multiple monitors would be a nice addition.  Frankly, I am 
just glad to have the tool back after it was abandoned (almost) entirely in 
SCCM 2007.The support staff’s biggest complaint is lack of useable support 
for multiple monitors.  Also since SCCM service is delayed start, it takes a 
long time for the remote session to become available after a reboot.  That 
really hamstrings certain support workflows.


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] 
On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 8:22 AM
To: 'mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com>' 
<mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com>>
Subject: RE: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually 
worked?

The main thing I want them to add is support for remote machines. You could ask 
for Mac support too assuming you are managing your Mac’s with SCCM.

And yes Niall, it should be user voice I screwed up.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Isaac Holmes
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:43 PM
To: mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com>
Cc: ms...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ms...@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: Re: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually 
worked?

[External Email]

I would love to use it, but we would still have to buy another product to be 
able to remotely support and assist on Mac machines.

Isaac Holmes
IT Engineering Specialist

University of Notre Dame
320 IT Center
Notre Dame, IN 46556

(574) 631-3254<tel:(574)%20631-3254>

On Nov 29, 2016 8:08 PM, "Niall Brady" 
<any...@gmail.com<mailto:any...@gmail.com>> wrote:
shouldn't this be a uservoice instead john ?

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Marcum, John 
<jmar...@bradley.com<mailto:jmar...@bradley.com>> wrote:
How many of you would like to use ConfigMgr remote control however it’s limited 
functionality prevents you from doing so? Worse still is that you are likely 
paying for some other remote control solution because remote control in 
ConfigMgr just doesn’t meet your needs. If you agree and you’d like to see 
improvements made in the current remote control offering in ConfigMgr please 
vote up my item on connect.

https://connect.microsoft.com/ConfigurationManagervnext/feedbackdetail/view/3113536/make-configmgr-remote-control-more-useful







Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.




Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is intended only 
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may 
contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and delete or destroy all copies of the original message and 
attachments thereto. Email sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as 
required by law or regulation. Thank you.

Re: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually worked?

2016-12-01 Thread Joe Krilov 
"Also since SCCM service is delayed start, it takes a long time for the
remote session to become available after a reboot.  That really hamstrings
certain support workflows."

Would simply changing the startup to Automatic for the Configuration
Manager Remote Control service using Group Policy fix this?

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Miller, Todd <todd-mil...@uiowa.edu> wrote:

> Better support for multiple monitors would be a nice addition.  Frankly, I
> am just glad to have the tool back after it was abandoned (almost) entirely
> in SCCM 2007.The support staff’s biggest complaint is lack of useable
> support for multiple monitors.  Also since SCCM service is delayed start,
> it takes a long time for the remote session to become available after a
> reboot.  That really hamstrings certain support workflows.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcum, John
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 01, 2016 8:22 AM
> *To:* 'mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com' <mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com>
> *Subject:* RE: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it
> actually worked?
>
>
>
> The main thing I want them to add is support for remote machines. You
> could ask for Mac support too assuming you are managing your Mac’s with
> SCCM.
>
>
> And yes Niall, it should be user voice I screwed up.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] *On Behalf Of *Isaac
> Holmes
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:43 PM
> *To:* mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com
> *Cc:* ms...@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it
> actually worked?
>
>
>
> *[External Email]*
>
> I would love to use it, but we would still have to buy another product to
> be able to remotely support and assist on Mac machines.
>
> Isaac Holmes
> IT Engineering Specialist
>
> University of Notre Dame
> 320 IT Center
> Notre Dame, IN 46556
>
> (574) 631-3254
>
>
>
> On Nov 29, 2016 8:08 PM, "Niall Brady" <any...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> shouldn't this be a uservoice instead john ?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Marcum, John <jmar...@bradley.com> wrote:
>
> How many of you would like to use ConfigMgr remote control however it’s
> limited functionality prevents you from doing so? Worse still is that you
> are likely paying for some other remote control solution because remote
> control in ConfigMgr just doesn’t meet your needs. If you agree and you’d
> like to see improvements made in the current remote control offering in
> ConfigMgr please vote up my item on connect.
>
>
>
> https://connect.microsoft.com/ConfigurationManagervnext/
> feedbackdetail/view/3113536/make-configmgr-remote-control-more-useful
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
> protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
> this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by
> the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is
> intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
> addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
> and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the
> intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or
> destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email
> sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as required by law or
> regulation. Thank you.
> --
>

RE: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually worked?

2016-12-01 Thread Miller, Todd 
Better support for multiple monitors would be a nice addition.  Frankly, I am 
just glad to have the tool back after it was abandoned (almost) entirely in 
SCCM 2007.The support staff’s biggest complaint is lack of useable support 
for multiple monitors.  Also since SCCM service is delayed start, it takes a 
long time for the remote session to become available after a reboot.  That 
really hamstrings certain support workflows.


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 8:22 AM
To: 'mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com' <mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually 
worked?

The main thing I want them to add is support for remote machines. You could ask 
for Mac support too assuming you are managing your Mac’s with SCCM.

And yes Niall, it should be user voice I screwed up.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Isaac Holmes
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:43 PM
To: mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com>
Cc: ms...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ms...@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: Re: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually 
worked?

[External Email]

I would love to use it, but we would still have to buy another product to be 
able to remotely support and assist on Mac machines.

Isaac Holmes
IT Engineering Specialist

University of Notre Dame
320 IT Center
Notre Dame, IN 46556

(574) 631-3254

On Nov 29, 2016 8:08 PM, "Niall Brady" 
<any...@gmail.com<mailto:any...@gmail.com>> wrote:
shouldn't this be a uservoice instead john ?

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Marcum, John 
<jmar...@bradley.com<mailto:jmar...@bradley.com>> wrote:
How many of you would like to use ConfigMgr remote control however it’s limited 
functionality prevents you from doing so? Worse still is that you are likely 
paying for some other remote control solution because remote control in 
ConfigMgr just doesn’t meet your needs. If you agree and you’d like to see 
improvements made in the current remote control offering in ConfigMgr please 
vote up my item on connect.

https://connect.microsoft.com/ConfigurationManagervnext/feedbackdetail/view/3113536/make-configmgr-remote-control-more-useful







Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.





Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is intended only 
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may 
contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and delete or destroy all copies of the original message and 
attachments thereto. Email sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as 
required by law or regulation. Thank you.

RE: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually worked?

2016-12-01 Thread Marcum, John 
The main thing I want them to add is support for remote machines. You could ask 
for Mac support too assuming you are managing your Mac’s with SCCM.

And yes Niall, it should be user voice I screwed up.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Isaac Holmes
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:43 PM
To: mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com
Cc: ms...@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually 
worked?

[External Email]

I would love to use it, but we would still have to buy another product to be 
able to remotely support and assist on Mac machines.

Isaac Holmes
IT Engineering Specialist

University of Notre Dame
320 IT Center
Notre Dame, IN 46556

(574) 631-3254

On Nov 29, 2016 8:08 PM, "Niall Brady" 
<any...@gmail.com<mailto:any...@gmail.com>> wrote:
shouldn't this be a uservoice instead john ?

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Marcum, John 
<jmar...@bradley.com<mailto:jmar...@bradley.com>> wrote:
How many of you would like to use ConfigMgr remote control however it’s limited 
functionality prevents you from doing so? Worse still is that you are likely 
paying for some other remote control solution because remote control in 
ConfigMgr just doesn’t meet your needs. If you agree and you’d like to see 
improvements made in the current remote control offering in ConfigMgr please 
vote up my item on connect.

https://connect.microsoft.com/ConfigurationManagervnext/feedbackdetail/view/3113536/make-configmgr-remote-control-more-useful







Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

Re: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually worked?

2016-11-29 Thread Niall Brady 
shouldn't this be a uservoice instead john ?

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Marcum, John  wrote:

> How many of you would like to use ConfigMgr remote control however it’s
> limited functionality prevents you from doing so? Worse still is that you
> are likely paying for some other remote control solution because remote
> control in ConfigMgr just doesn’t meet your needs. If you agree and you’d
> like to see improvements made in the current remote control offering in
> ConfigMgr please vote up my item on connect.
>
>
>
> https://connect.microsoft.com/ConfigurationManagervnext/
> feedbackdetail/view/3113536/make-configmgr-remote-control-more-useful
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
> protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
> this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>