executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(16);
while(true) {
SocketChannel connection = serverSocketChannel.accept();
connection.configueBlocking(false);
executor.execute(() -> writeTask(connection));
}
void writeTask(SocketChannel s){
s.isBlocking();
}
public final SelectableChannel configureBlocking(boolean block) throws
IOException
{
synchronized (regLock) {
...
blocking = block;
}
return this;
}
We see the following situation: the main thread is setting
connection.configueBlocking(false)
and another thread (launched by executor) is reading that. So, it looks
like a datarace.
My question is:
1. Here
configureBlocking
is synchronized so it behaves as memory barrier. It means that code is ok-
even if reading/writing to
blocking
field is not synchronized- reading/writing boolean is atomic.
2. What if
configureBlocking
wouldn't be synchronized? What in a such situation? I think that it would
be necessary to emit a memory barrier because it is theoretically possible
that setting blocking field could be reordered.
Am I right?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mechanical-sympathy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to mechanical-sympathy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
