Re: synchronized and ReentrantLock are REALLY the same?

On Friday, May 18, 2018 at 11:10:45 PM UTC-5, Gil Tene wrote: > > > > On Friday, May 18, 2018 at 2:30:08 AM UTC-5, Francesco Nigro wrote: >> >> Thanks Gil! >> >> I will failback to my original (semi-practical) concern, using this >> renewed knowledge :) >> Suppose that we want to perform write

Re: synchronized and ReentrantLock are REALLY the same?

On Friday, May 18, 2018 at 2:30:08 AM UTC-5, Francesco Nigro wrote: > > Thanks Gil! > > I will failback to my original (semi-practical) concern, using this > renewed knowledge :) > Suppose that we want to perform write operations surrounding both a j.u.c. > Lock and synchronized mutual

Re: RDMA socket support in the JDK

Java 7 introduced Sockets Direct Protocol ... a mechanism to achieve RDMA across Linux JVMs that had specific OFED device drivers and Infiniband ($$) as the physical network between JVMs’ NICs. With Intel’s gift of iWarp to OFED ... enabling RDMA over Ethernet ... maybe this JEP could drive

RDMA socket support in the JDK

Hi, I just saw a JEP draft for RDMA socket support in the JDK. Anyone got any experience with it? JEP Draft: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203434 JDK Bug with webreg: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8195160 /Kasper -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: JMM- conservative and formal point of view.

Aleksey, thanks for your explanation. By the way, your presentation (I mean slides) is great- when it comes to the content and not only :-). W dniu środa, 16 maja 2018 19:33:22 UTC+2 użytkownik John Hening napisał: > > The following picture comes from: >

Re: synchronized and ReentrantLock are REALLY the same?

Thanks Gil! I will failback to my original (semi-practical) concern, using this renewed knowledge :) Suppose that we want to perform write operations surrounding both a j.u.c. Lock and synchronized mutual exclusion block and we want: 1. these writes operations to not being moved inside the