[Medianews] Why the World Doesn't Need Hi-Def DVD's

2006-05-11 Thread George Antunes
May 11, 2006

David Pogue
NY Times

Why the World Doesn't Need Hi-Def DVD's

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/11/technology/11pogue.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print



WHEN did you first become cynical about the electronics industry?

Was it when VHS went out of style, and you had to buy all your movies again 
on DVD? Was it the time(s) you never got the rebate you mailed away for? Or 
was it when your computer's 90-day warranty expired, and the thing croaked 
two days later?

Doesn't matter. As it turns out, you didn't even know the meaning of the 
word cynical. This month, Toshiba's HD-A1 high-definition DVD player hit 
store shelves. It's the first marketplace volley in an absurd and pointless 
format war among the titans of the movie, electronics and computer industries.

Just contemplating the rise of a new DVD format is enough to make you feel 
played. What's wrong with the original DVD format, anyway? It offers 
brilliant picture, thundering surround sound and bonus material. The 
catalog of DVD movies is immense and reasonably priced. And DVD players are 
so cheap, they practically fall out of magazines; 82 percent of American 
homes have at least one DVD player.

To electronics executives, all of this can mean only one thing: It's time 
to junk that format and start over.

Of course, the executives don't explain this decision by saying, "Because 
we've saturated the market for regular DVD players."

Instead, they talk about video and picture quality. A DVD picture offers 
much better color and clarity than regular TV, but not as good as 
high-definition TV. The new discs hold far more information, enough to 
display Hollywood's masterpieces in true high definition (if you have a 
high-definition TV, of course).

UNFORTUNATELY, this idea occurred simultaneously to both Sony and Toshiba. 
Each dreamed up its own format for a high-def DVD. Each then assembled an 
army of partners. Toshiba's format, called HD-DVD, has attracted Microsoft, 
Sanyo, NEC and movie studios like New Line and Universal. Sony's format, 
called Blu-ray, has in its camp Apple, Panasonic, Philips, Samsung, Sharp, 
Pioneer, Dell and movie studios like Sony, 20th Century Fox and Disney. 
(Some companies, like HP, LG, Warner Brothers and Paramount, intend to 
create products for both formats.)

The new DVD players will play standard DVD's, but that's as far as the 
compatibility good news goes. Movies in Toshiba's format won't play in DVD 
players from Sony's side, and vice versa.

At first, pundits guessed that Sony's Blu-ray format might win, because it 
had signed up so many more movie studios, its discs have greater capacity, 
and the PlayStation 3, expected to top best-seller lists this fall, will 
double as a Blu-ray player.

But Toshiba has two aces up its sleeve. First, its first HD-DVD player is 
available now, giving it a head start; Blu-ray players aren't expected 
until the end of June. Second, this new player, the HD-A1, costs $500 — 
half the price of the cheapest Blu-ray deck.

The HD-A1 is a pretty big box: 17.7 by 13.3 by 4.3 inches, more like an 
early VCR than a sleek modern DVD player.

The $500 isn't the only price you pay for being an insanely early adopter; 
this baby is slow — really slow. It takes over a minute just to turn on; 
menus are sometimes slow to respond; and a newly inserted DVD takes 45 
seconds just to get to the F.B.I. warning. (And no, even the brave new DVD 
format doesn't let you skip over that tiresome warning.)

The remote is a disaster; its buttons are identically shaped and 
illogically placed. Not only are they not illuminated, but their labels are 
painted on faintly and in what must be 4-point type. (A sibling model, the 
HD-XA1, adds minor goodies like a backlit remote — for $300 more.)

Finally, though, the movie begins — and your shield of cynicism begins to 
waver. As you watch the brilliant colors, super-black blacks and 
ridiculously sharp detail — up to six times the resolution of a standard 
DVD — you realize that you've never seen anything quite this 
cinematic-looking in your home before.

Even high-definition TV doesn't look this good; the amount of information 
HD-DVD pumps to your screen dwarfs what you get from high-def satellite or 
cable (36 megabits a second maximum, versus 19 or less).

You need a big screen to benefit from all this picture data, however. The 
impact of the extra detail begins to evaporate at screen sizes below, say, 
35 inches.

Even on a small screen, though, you don't have to interrupt the movie to 
open the DVD menu (to get access to settings and extras); on a high-def 
DVD, the menu appears at the bottom or side of the screen as the movie 
continues to play.

That feature makes it quick and easy to turn on subtitles during a mumbled 
scene, for example, or to tune in the director's commentary track without 
losing your place. I watched six beautifully made HD-DVD movies from Warner 
and Universal, including the gut-churning "Training Day" a

[Medianews] Why the World Doesn't Need Hi-Def DVD's

2006-05-11 Thread Monty Solomon

Why the World Doesn't Need Hi-Def DVD's

David Pogue
The New York Times
May 11, 2006

WHEN did you first become cynical about the electronics industry?

Was it when VHS went out of style, and you had to buy all your movies 
again on DVD? Was it the time(s) you never got the rebate you mailed 
away for? Or was it when your computer's 90-day warranty expired, and 
the thing croaked two days later?

Doesn't matter. As it turns out, you didn't even know the meaning of 
the word cynical. This month, Toshiba's HD-A1 high-definition DVD 
player hit store shelves. It's the first marketplace volley in an 
absurd and pointless format war among the titans of the movie, 
electronics and computer industries.

Just contemplating the rise of a new DVD format is enough to make you 
feel played. What's wrong with the original DVD format, anyway? It 
offers brilliant picture, thundering surround sound and bonus 
material. The catalog of DVD movies is immense and reasonably priced. 
And DVD players are so cheap, they practically fall out of magazines; 
82 percent of American homes have at least one DVD player.

To electronics executives, all of this can mean only one thing: It's 
time to junk that format and start over.

Of course, the executives don't explain this decision by saying, 
"Because we've saturated the market for regular DVD players."

Instead, they talk about video and picture quality. A DVD picture 
offers much better color and clarity than regular TV, but not as good 
as high-definition TV. The new discs hold far more information, 
enough to display Hollywood's masterpieces in true high definition 
(if you have a high-definition TV, of course).

...

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/11/technology/11pogue.html?ex=130500&en=3c4fcf229a0f3355&ei=5090



Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_

MEDIANEWS mailing list
medianews@twiar.org
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]