Re: [Meep-discuss] (add-flux) object is "synchronized-magnetic"?

2017-10-26 Thread Steven G. Johnson
> On Oct 26, 2017, at 6:36 PM, Ardavan Oskooi wrote: > > On 10/26/2017 02:41 PM, Phuc Hoang wrote: >> Does anyone know if "synchronized-magnetic" is implicitly implemented when >> (add-flux) is called? > > As described in the documentation >

Re: [Meep-discuss] (add-flux) object is "synchronized-magnetic"?

2017-10-26 Thread Ardavan Oskooi
On 10/26/2017 02:41 PM, Phuc Hoang wrote: Does anyone know if  "synchronized-magnetic" is implicitly implemented when (add-flux) is called? As described in the documentation , the add-flux routine involves