Hello all,
I have searched the archives and read through all the material on the
website but am still unsatisfied with my understanding of units on the
Material Dispersion
page.
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Meep_Tutorial/Material_dispersion
I know from the archives that omega and
Is numpy/python-meep competitive with the the C++ Meep interface
for very long simulations with interpolated discrete custom source
functions.
Best,
Eric
___
meep-discuss mailing list
meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
Can one define a source function with interpolated discrete data with
inline C/C++ when using
python-meep in the same way it is used to speed the definition a material
function?
-Eric
___
meep-discuss mailing list
meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
Hello Meep users,
In a thread titled: using perfect metal in C++ interface (
http://www.mail-archive.com/meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu/msg01997.html)
Professor Johnson clarified that one controls the spatial location of the
polarizability with sigma. However, both Renaud Vallee (
I would like to know the spatial coordinates of each point in an an output
volume (a line, for example).
Can I get meep to output the spatial coordinates of each point? This would
be excellent.
If not, can anyone explain how meep compute the coordinates that it chooses
to output so I can do it
? It will not work on my version of MEEP 1.2.1.
meep-fields-solve-cw is quite useful. Can this tool be repaired?
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Eric Smoll ericsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the meep-fields-solve-cw function simply not work?
I have tried inserting it into tutorial examples (using
Hello MEEP users,
I know that you can use the flux-region tool in an FDTD simulation to find
far field measurements of absorption, scattering, and extinction. As far as
I understand, I should be able to compute these quantities using the field
amplitudes given by meep-fields-solve-cw and the
7 matches
Mail list logo
