Re: project division

2009-05-02 Thread Nicholas Tang
Here's a silly question - why do you need to blow the entire cache for that blog just because the user posted? If there's a chunk of the page on each of those pages that would be impacted, what if you load that chunk in an ajax call, and then, since it's a separate page, you can just blow *that*

Re: project division

2009-05-02 Thread Clint Webb
Rather than using memcached as a global site cache (which it is not really designed to be), you might have more success actually using it the way it was intended. Which means as an object cache inside your code. Otherwise you are just going to be doing a lot of effort to get a square peg to fit

Re: project division

2009-05-02 Thread Clint Webb
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: Clint Webb wrote: Rather than using memcached as a global site cache (which it is not really designed to be), you might have more success actually using it the way it was intended. Which means as an object cache

Re: project division

2009-05-02 Thread Les Mikesell
Clint Webb wrote: On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: Clint Webb wrote: Rather than using memcached as a global site cache (which it is not really designed to be), you might have more success actually using it the way it was intended. Which means as an