Thanks guys, this is quite helpful
In the same vein, can we also say that memcache replication is also a
client side driven solution?
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
memcached group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
Hi Dormando,
Thanks for asking this question. I manually looked at the patches that
went in memcached 1.4.17 and looked at the code in memcached 1.6.0beta.
The 4 issues that we were interested in (CVE-2013-7239 CVE-2013-7291
CVE-2013-7290 CVE-2013-0179) is already fixed in memcached
Also, anyone heard about repcached? Is this a patch users would need to
add in order to get data replication feature? Does memcached endorse this?
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
memcached group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
My company is having problems connecting to your site from 64.132.38.206. I
can access it from all other places I've tried and I manage our internet
proxies, so I know we're not explicitly blocking access to the site.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Ranjit D'Souza bernard@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks guys, this is quite helpful
In the same vein, can we also say that memcache replication is also a client
side driven solution?
In the stock system, there is no replication - although I believe
others done it
FYI, I have written a memcached compatible KVS named yrmcds that implements
master-slave replication.
As this is slightly off-topic from the list, please ask me directly if you
are interested in it:
http://cybozu.github.io/yrmcds/
@ymmt2005
On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 6:33:24 PM UTC+9, Ranjit
Dear Gourav Gavate,
I am really thankful to you for sharing your problem solution , i was
having the same issue and get solved by following your solution steps.
Thanks Regards,
Ashish tyagi
On Saturday, October 26, 2013 6:16:33 PM UTC+5:30, Gourav Gavate wrote:
Dear ,
i got
