Re: Tag based invalidation

2009-06-15 Thread Eugene Bragin
Hi Dustin, could you give some more details on this inefficiency you mentioned please? We are using memcached-tags on 10 memcached servers with 40Gigs of cache all together. It works just fine. Invalidation of millions of items is just instant, so is propagation of tags. Are you sure you've used it

Re: Tag based invalidation

2009-06-15 Thread Dustin
On Jun 15, 3:24 am, Eugene Bragin wrote: > Hi Jean-Charles, > have a look:http://code.google.com/p/memcached-tags/ > andhttp://code.google.com/p/memcached-tag/ Last time I looked at either of these, they were too inefficient at storage and invalidation to make it into the code base proper.

Re: Tag based invalidation

2009-06-15 Thread Eugene Bragin
Hi Jean-Charles, have a look: http://code.google.com/p/memcached-tags/ and http://code.google.com/p/memcached-tag/ 2009/6/15 JC > > Hi everyone, > > There was some time ago a topic about tag based invalidation. Some > ideas and even possible architecture were mentionned but not

Tag based invalidation

2009-06-15 Thread JC
Hi everyone, There was some time ago a topic about tag based invalidation. Some ideas and even possible architecture were mentionned but not described. Is it possible to know a little bit more about what you have in mind for this feature? Because the more I think about it, the more possible uses