Re: [mer-general] Updating PulseAudio

2012-10-16 Thread Ross Kendall
On 16/10/12 09:21, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: snip I would like to just drop the closed modules, but is it an acceptable solution? It would cause major regressions on Nemo's N900 hardware adaptation at least: audio quality during calls would be bad (very bad, I believe) and the speaker protection

Re: [mer-general] Nemo UX guidelines publishing

2012-10-16 Thread Ross Kendall
Hi, I can understand how at this point it might be practical for using github for versioning rapidly developing UX guidelines, but isn't the wiki suitable for this kind of thing? It can keep track of changes as well. Also, in terms of a general Nemo website wouldn't it make sense to use a

Re: [mer-general] Nemo UX guidelines publishing

2012-10-16 Thread Ross Kendall
On 16/10/12 12:30, Robin Burchell wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Ross Kendall r...@rosskendall.com wrote: I can understand how at this point it might be practical for using github for versioning rapidly developing UX guidelines, but isn't the wiki suitable for this kind of thing? It