Re: [mer-general] Advice needed for Qt4 development with MerSDK (from Sailfish)
Martin, yes implicitly that would be the case. I am generally testing and targeting last Nemo VM x86 image, so I can use X11 and Qt4.8 (hopefully there will be further image releases?!). Sailfish Qt Creator and MerSDK work perfectly for me, but they have no Qt4 components. That is why I wanted the advice, whether there are generally any objections in adding repos of Nemo into this MerSDK so I can build against 4.8 with Sailfish Qt Creator / MerSDK (easy building rpms and testing/deployment) and still work with Nemo VM as test environment. cheers simon :-) On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Martin Kampas wrote: > Hi, > > > > > [...] using X11Embed > > > > in Wayland environment? > > > > If I understand you correctly it is not Qt5 what prevents you to use X11, > but the fact that there is no X11 running on the device. > > > > BR, > > Martin > > > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 06:23:42 PM Simon Bolek wrote: > > > Thank you, I would love to use Qt5, however it has no possibility to > > > compile apps with X11 which I than need to embedd into another app using > > > X11Embedd. > > > > > > cheers > > > simon :-) > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Daniil Ivanov >wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > > > Most likely an alternative is to use Qt5. > > > > > > > > Thanks, Daniil > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Simon Bolek < > simon.bo...@googlemail.com>wrote: > > > >> hello troops ;) > > > >> > > > >> what would you advise me to do? Sailfish released MerSDK against which > > > >> building RPM packages via QtCreator and testing them in VirtualBox is > > > >> easy > > > >> now and straight forward. However there are no qt4 components in this > > > >> Sailfish MerSDK(only Qt5). > > > >> So would you just add Nemo repos to this MerSDK to zypper Qt4 > components > > > >> or would you not advise that for some reason? And than what would be > the > > > >> alternative? > > > >> > > > >> cheers > > > >> simon:) > > >
Re: [mer-general] Advice needed for Qt4 development with MerSDK (from Sailfish)
Hi, > [...] using X11Embed in Wayland environment? If I understand you correctly it is not Qt5 what prevents you to use X11, but the fact that there is no X11 running on the device. BR, Martin On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 06:23:42 PM Simon Bolek wrote: > Thank you, I would love to use Qt5, however it has no possibility to > compile apps with X11 which I than need to embedd into another app using > X11Embedd. > > cheers > simon :-) > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Daniil Ivanov wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > Most likely an alternative is to use Qt5. > > > > Thanks, Daniil > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Simon Bolek wrote: > >> hello troops ;) > >> > >> what would you advise me to do? Sailfish released MerSDK against which > >> building RPM packages via QtCreator and testing them in VirtualBox is > >> easy > >> now and straight forward. However there are no qt4 components in this > >> Sailfish MerSDK(only Qt5). > >> So would you just add Nemo repos to this MerSDK to zypper Qt4 components > >> or would you not advise that for some reason? And than what would be the > >> alternative? > >> > >> cheers > >> simon:)
Re: [mer-general] Advice needed for Qt4 development with MerSDK (from Sailfish)
Thank you, I would love to use Qt5, however it has no possibility to compile apps with X11 which I than need to embedd into another app using X11Embedd. cheers simon :-) On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Daniil Ivanov wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Most likely an alternative is to use Qt5. > > Thanks, Daniil > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Simon Bolek > wrote: > >> hello troops ;) >> >> what would you advise me to do? Sailfish released MerSDK against which >> building RPM packages via QtCreator and testing them in VirtualBox is easy >> now and straight forward. However there are no qt4 components in this >> Sailfish MerSDK(only Qt5). >> So would you just add Nemo repos to this MerSDK to zypper Qt4 components >> or would you not advise that for some reason? And than what would be the >> alternative? >> >> cheers >> simon:) >> > >
Re: [mer-general] Advice needed for Qt4 development with MerSDK (from Sailfish)
Hi Simon, Most likely an alternative is to use Qt5. Thanks, Daniil On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Simon Bolek wrote: > hello troops ;) > > what would you advise me to do? Sailfish released MerSDK against which > building RPM packages via QtCreator and testing them in VirtualBox is easy > now and straight forward. However there are no qt4 components in this > Sailfish MerSDK(only Qt5). > So would you just add Nemo repos to this MerSDK to zypper Qt4 components > or would you not advise that for some reason? And than what would be the > alternative? > > cheers > simon:) >
[mer-general] Advice needed for Qt4 development with MerSDK (from Sailfish)
hello troops ;) what would you advise me to do? Sailfish released MerSDK against which building RPM packages via QtCreator and testing them in VirtualBox is easy now and straight forward. However there are no qt4 components in this Sailfish MerSDK(only Qt5). So would you just add Nemo repos to this MerSDK to zypper Qt4 components or would you not advise that for some reason? And than what would be the alternative? cheers simon:)
